Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At June 30, 2005, unreserved fund balance of the general <br />fund was $34.4 million of which $18 million is available for subsequent years' expenditures while total fund <br />balance declined to $38.6 million from $38.9 million. As a measure of the general fund's liquidity, it may be useful <br />to compare both unreserved fund balance and total fund balance to total fund expenditures. Unreserved fund <br />balance represents 54% of total fund expenditures, while total fund balance represents 61 % of that same amount. <br />The fund balance of the City's general fund decreased by $.3 million during the cUlTent fiscal year. <br /> <br />The following are the major funds that qualified under the reporting criteria for major funds selection: <br /> <br />General Fund - General fund revenues increased approximately $5 million this fiscal year due to increases in <br />property taxes and sales and other taxes offset by decreases in other revenue categories. Property taxes increased <br />$1.1 million as assessed valuations rose 3.79%, reflecting continued development in the City and increased prices <br />for existing residential properties, along with increased reimbursement from San Mateo County for prior year <br />payments to the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund. The general fund received a payment of $2.5 million <br />from the County as its share of the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) rebate in FY 2004/05. <br />ERAF, which was created by state law in the early 1990's, allowed the state to shift on an ongoing basis a portion <br />of each city, county, and special district's property taxes to school districts. This shift allowed the state to decrease <br />the state's general fund support to schools throughout the state and concomitantly reduced state funding of schools. <br />Within each county, ERAF revenues are allocated to schools based upon a fonnula that considers, among several <br />factors, the average daily attendance and the amount of each school district's own property tax revenue. Within <br />San Mateo County, the outcome of applying this fonnula was that the school districts did not require all of the <br />funds shifted from the cities, county, and special districts. Consequently, these funds were returned to each entity <br />in proportion to the amount that was initially collected. Gross property tax revenue actually increased $2.6 million, <br />but this increase was offset by a $1.5 million takeaway by the state. <br /> <br />General fund expenditures increased $3.5 million due to increased public safety expenditures as a result of higher <br />salaries and benefits in the amount of $4.8 million offset by budget reductions in various City programs. Total <br />expenditures were less than budgeted and represented an increase of 5.8% in FY 2004/05, to a total of $63.5 <br />million. <br /> <br />Transfers out of the general fund increased $1.1 million in FY 2004/05 resulting from increased transfers out for <br />debt service and capital projects. <br /> <br />Capital Outlay Fund - This fund accounts for resources provided to finance general governmental capital projects. <br />In FY 2004/05, the capital outlay fund generated $1.1 million in revenue, most of which was from <br />intergovernmental grants. This fund was also the recipient of$5.7 million of transfers from the general fund, $8.5 <br />million of other interfund transfers, and $2.6 million of land contribution from the Redevelopment Agency. Total <br />outlays were $20.3 million of which $17 million met with City's criteria for capitalization. The balance ($3.3 <br />million) was expended in FY 2004/05. Total outlays in the prior year (FY 2003/04) were $4 million. All of the <br />capital outlay fund's $28 million fund balance is reserved or designated for specific capital projects. <br /> <br />Redevelopment Agency Fund - This fund accounts for resources provided to finance the City's Redevelopment <br />Agency, a separate legal entity organized pursuant to the community redevelopment law of the Health and Safety <br />Code of the State of California. The City Council also serves on the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment <br />Agency. The Redevelopment Agency's fund balance decreased by $9.2 million primarily due to the expenditure of <br />proceeds of bonds issued for the downtown revitalization efforts in FY 2003/04 and the contribution of land to the <br />capital outlay fund. <br /> <br />Proprietary Funds <br />Enterprise fund net assets totaled $118.7 million at the end of the fiscal year, a decrease of $.3 million over the <br />prior year. Enterprise operating revenues were $34.1 million this year, an increase of $1.8 million from last year, <br />while net non-operating revenues were $(.9) million compared to $(.8) million the prior year. <br /> <br />Enterprise fund operating expenses were $33.4 million this year, up $2.2 million from the prior year, most of which <br />was due to higher operating expenses in the sewer and Port of Redwood City funds. <br /> <br />9 <br />