Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION 14675 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br />AMENDING THE STRATEGIC GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD <br />CITY TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION OF PROPERTIES <br />GENERALLY LOCATED AT WOODSIDE ROAD, HESS ROAD AND LUCERNE <br />AVENUE, AS FURTHER DESCRIBED IN THIS RESOLUTION, FROM <br />"COMMERICAL- NEIGHBORHOOD" AND "RESIDENTAIL HIGH DENSITY" TO <br />"COMMERCIAL -MIXED USE" <br />The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote by those present. <br />B. Ordinance Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance related to Stormwater Control; <br />Reducing Parking Requirements, and Establishing Creek Setback Requirements <br />City Engineer Lynch presented a Staff Report detailing the major issues <br />surrounding the proposed ordinance amendment, including landscaping, open <br />space, pollution prevention, parking rates, and creek setbacks. Lynch guided <br />people to a chart in the ordinance to clearly delineate the issues. Lynch advised <br />that there were two main questions as to why this topic was coming forward: 1. <br />Why are we doing this? and 2. Where did all the supporting data come from? <br />To answer the first question, Lynch stated that the Water Control Board asked <br />each City sixty questions regarding policies and procedures on the topic of <br />Stormwater Control, and Redwood City could only answer positively on about <br />thirty percent of the questions. As to the derivation of the supporting data, Lynch <br />introduced Curtis Williams of M.H.A. Environmental Consulting, and advised that <br />M.H.A. had researched with other cities to compare policies and procedures with <br />those of Redwood City. Williams noted that the changes are accepted <br />Stormwater procedures, that the recommendations are very practical and do not <br />place undue burden on the property owners, and that the regulations are flexible <br />enough for both today's development and that of the future. Williams also <br />clarified that the Downtown area was specifically left out of the proposed <br />ordinance amendment because the Downtown Precise Plan would govern how <br />this area would be handled. <br />Vice Mayor Pierce remarked on concerns about water quality and had questions <br />on parking and parking design pertaining to inclusion of bicycle parking and other <br />modes of transportation. Lynch verified that this was not included in the proposed <br />ordinance but rather was governed by C.C.A.G. policy, which the City must <br />comply with. Tom Passanisi also noted that this area was handled within the <br />Zoning Ordinance. <br />Council remarks included questions about a letter from J.R. Rodine Governmental <br />Affairs Consultant (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) which had been <br />submitted for the public record just prior to the meeting. <br />Mayor Ira opened the public hearing. <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NOVEMBER 14, 2005 <br />AND PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY BOARD PAGE 8 <br />MINUTES <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 61 <br />Page No. 43 <br />