Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2006 Council Priorities Workshop <br /> <br />* The City commitment to listen to the concerns of its citizens <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />* All the staff su pport <br />2. What did you find of least value in this community workshop session, and why? <br /> <br />* All where important <br />* Lots of lag time during break <br /> <br />2 <br />1 <br /> <br />* I was hoping that there would be more citizens participating <br />* My second helping of dessert <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />3. How can this process be improved? <br />* More Spanish translation to assist more Latino people <br /> <br />* More people <br /> <br />4 <br />3 <br /> <br />* It can't <br /> <br />2 <br />2 <br /> <br />* Very good process <br />* More PowerPoint with pictures, photos - maybe describe some of the issues from the City's viewpoint? <br /> <br />* Expedite it - more recorders/coordinators? <br />* Offer it on-line <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />* It does not seem that there was participation from all parts of the City - Certain parts were likely over- <br />represented - perhaps you could target those communities that did not participate <br /> <br />* Always not enough time for folks to express themselves and work to priority consensus <br /> <br />* Good balance with very little time <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />* Childcare, better outreach to Hispanic community, workshops around the east side of Redwood City <br /> <br />1 -c <br />Q) <br />cc <br />CD <br />2 I\) <br />~ <br /> <br />S:\Community Meetings\Community Workshop on City Council Priorities\Councii Priorities Workshop January 19 - Evaluations <br />