My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-07-23 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-07-23 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2018 4:47:34 PM
Creation date
7/19/2018 7:49:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
7/23/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
685
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLK-Maria Vazquez <br />From: CD -Steven Turner <br />Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 12:04 PM <br />To: Kelly Gherardi <br />Subject: RE: Question - Mt. Carmel Historic District <br />Hello Kelly and Dave, <br />With regards to pros and cons: <br />• Historic districts typically do not require a fee (annual or otherwise) from property owners in the district. <br />Redwood City does not charge a fee to property owners in our existing historic districts (Mezesville, Main Street, <br />or Stambaugh -Heller). <br />• There are no changes to assessments or taxes when a historic district is established. However, historic property <br />owners may be eligible for a tax program referred to as the Mills Act, which provides a lower property tax in <br />exchange for site improvements intended to preserve the historic character of the site. More information on the <br />Mills Act can be found here. <br />• Regarding improvements- there isn't expected to be any restrictions for changes to the exterior of historic <br />homes. However, any proposed changes to the exterior would likely be required to conform to the Secretary of <br />the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The Historic Resources Advisory Committee <br />(HRAC) currently uses these standards to evaluate historic properties (including single-family homes) throughout <br />the City. Historic resources within a future Mt. Carmel district would be reviewed for consistency with these <br />standards by the HRAC. Property owners may also be eligible to use the California State Historic Building Code, <br />which provides alternative building code requirements with the intent to promote historic preservation. <br />• Regarding Demolition- for historic properties (including those within a historic district) a total site demolition <br />would be restricted. This is because demolition of a historic building would not be consistent with the <br />Secretary's Standards. Demolition would be allowed in cases where the building is unsafe, or, has severely <br />degraded to a point where the historic character has been lost. The HRAC would review demolition requests for <br />historic buildings. <br />Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other questions. <br />STEVEN TURNER <br />Planning Manager — Community Development Department <br />City of Redwood City <br />Phone: (650) 780-5934 <br />From: Kelly Gherardi <br />Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 2:42 PM <br />To: CD -Steven Turner <sturner@redwoodcity.org> <br />Subject: Question - Mt. Carmel Historic District <br />Hi Steven - <br />We live at 285 Jeter St. in Mt. Carmel, a borne built in 1937. In preparation for the City meeting being held July <br />23, here are some questions. <br />Is there any information about what the pros and cons are for homeowners, for designating a historic district? <br />For example, would there possibly be: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.