My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-02-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-02-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2006 11:55:07 AM
Creation date
2/23/2006 4:54:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/27/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> SA <br /> Page 9 <br />such as "Parking" by Weant and Levinson and "The Dimensions of Parking" by NPA Parking <br />Consultants Council were reviewed as well. Finally, a broad range of academic research was <br />reviewed, including several papers by Professor Donald Shoup and many other studies by <br />academics and non-profit organizations. A summary of these materials is included in Appendix <br />6. <br />Workintl with the Community <br />In addition to analyzing the current and projected parking needs in Downtown and researching <br />the breadth of approaches (good and bad) used in other cities, staff also held a series of three <br />interactive public workshops with Downtown stakeholders, two of which discussed parking <br />requirements. The purpose was to help Downtown stakeholders understand the challenges that <br />lie ahead and our options for dealing with them, as well as for staff to learn from those "in the <br />trenches" what are the problems and strengths of our parking supply and what they feel is needed <br />to make it better. <br />Workshop #1 was held on March 15th. During this meeting staff gave a presentation discussing <br />the factors laid out in the introduction to this report-the new patterns of parking use that will <br />likely result upon the opening of the cinema, the high cost of building new parking, the park <br />once nature of Downtown, etc. There was then a lively discussion period where the attendees <br />asked staff questions and voiced some of their concerns. <br />Workshop #2 was held on March 29th. For this session, staff brought a menu of the options <br />available to us to the group and explained the advantages and disadvantages of each. Interactive <br />games were played in which the group plotted areas which they thought were best for employee <br />and customer parking, and what they thought were the best approaches for future parking <br />requirements. \ <br />Greater attendance would have been helpful, but in all other respects the workshops were a great <br />success. The stakeholders really seemecf to grasp the difficulty of managing parking in a lively, <br />walkable downtown and were very supportive of taking a 'just enough" approach to Downtown <br />parking requirements. In addition, staff learned a great amount from those with first-hand <br />knowledge about Downtown's needs and that knowledge has benefited this plan tremendously. <br />SUmmary of Recommended Actions <br />In order to meet the new demands that will be placed on the Downtown parking system as <br />Downtown grows, while still maintaining an attractive, pedestrian-friendly environment, staff <br />recommends the following changes to Article 30 of the Zoning Ordinance: <br />Recommendation #1: Simplify and Lower Downtown's Parking Requirements <br />Based on many factors, including our current parking situation; the walkable, dense, mixed-use, <br />transit.connected nature of Downtown; academic research; best practices; and city goals such as <br /> '1>~~e 2 <br /> '_no., ._.... _. ..,.-....._...._. ._----,--.-----. --..-..,-..- "'---" --~._----~_._-- ..._---~.._.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.