My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-02-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-02-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2006 11:55:07 AM
Creation date
2/23/2006 4:54:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/27/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 8A <br /> Page 28 <br />Another factor to consider when developing residential parking requirements is that different <br />types of units generate different parking needs. Some of the factors that lower residential parking <br />need are: <br />1. Income. "In 17 studies on vehicle ownership, income was found to be a <br /> significant driver of vehicle ownership. This pattern holds throughout the Bay <br /> Area. In the 1990 census, households earning between $20,000, and $25,000 <br /> owned on average only 1.30 vehicles, 26 percent below the region wide average <br /> of 1.76 cars. And 28 percent of households earning between $10,000 and $15,000 <br /> did not own a vehicle at all. By comparisQn, 10 percent of households region wide <br /> lived without a car." (Quoted from Rethinking Residential Parking: Myths and <br /> Facts by the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California). <br />2. Age. In Housing Shortage / Parking Surplus, the Transportation and Land Use <br /> Coalition also described the correlation between age and vehicle ownership: "In <br /> the Bay Area, the vehicle ownership rates of seniors are about 30% lower than the <br /> general public. .. .the difference is even more marked with seniors aged 75 and <br /> over, who own just half as many vehicles as the average household." <br />3. Renting. "According to 1990 census data, the most recent for which a breakdown <br /> is available, 41 % of rental households in Santa Clara County own one vehicle and <br /> 9% own no vehicle at all - more than double the proportions for owner occupiers. <br /> apartment dwellers also own fewer vehicles than those in detached homes - <br /> regardless of income." (Quoted from Housing Shortage / Parking Surplus by the <br /> Transportation and Land Use Coalition). <br />4. Transit. "Residents of dense, transit-oriented development own fewer vehicles. <br /> Residents in light rail corrid<;>rs use transit as their predominant commute mode <br /> more than five times as ofteh as residents countywide. In turn, they are less likely <br /> to own a vehicle. A recent study of the factors influencing vehicle ownership in <br /> the Bay Area, Los Angeles and Chicago found that ... the densest, most transit <br /> accessible areas (show) the lowest vehicle ownership rates." (Quoted from <br /> Housing Shortage / Parking Surplus by the Transportation and Land Use <br /> Coalition). <br />5. Unit size. Fewer bedrooms=fewer drivers=fewer parking spaces needed. One <br /> project in Downtown Palo Alto which offers 260 square foot studio apartments <br /> only provides 0.5 spaces per unit, which is only 81 % occupied during peak <br /> periods. <br />Considering all of this, it is clear that residential parking requirements should be lowered and <br />broken down by unit type. The following approach is recommended. There should be separate <br />requirements for studio units, 1 bedroom units, and units with 2 or more bedrooms. In addition, <br />discounts should be given for senior housing and affordable housing to reflect the lower car <br />ownership of residents of these types of housing. <br /> 1>g~~ 21 <br /> _._-.-. .. ._. .~-" .... -, .-.--..... _......._~ .__.. ..~.~._.~_....- . .._-- <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.