My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-02-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-02-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2006 11:55:07 AM
Creation date
2/23/2006 4:54:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/27/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> SA <br /> Page 30 <br />Hotels justify their own category for a few reasons. First of all, they truly act differently than <br />commercial and residential uses. Although sometimes difficult, it is possible to estimate the <br />parking demand per square foot of floor area for 'all other commercial uses, including uses such <br />as restaurants and theaters which often use seat counts to calculate parking demand. No so with <br />hotels. There is really no reliable way to estimate parking other than using the number of guest <br />rooms. Also, it is unlikely that a hotel building would regularly switch to an office building or <br />retail configuration. This means that having a separate parking requirement would not impede <br />natural changes in tenancies. <br />Based on suburban conditions, ITE states that the average peak parking generation rate for hotels <br />is 0.89 spaces per guest room, in addition to any parking required for conference facilities, <br />restaurants, etc. Several factors must be kept in mind. First, hotels have dramatically different <br />peaks than many other uses (particularly office and retail), so they offer excellent opportunities <br />for shared parking. The peak use of hotel parking is overnight, when most other uses are idle. <br />Meanwhile, while other uses are active during the day, hotel patrons are out and about and their <br />parking is 60% to 70% unoccupied. These shared parking opportunities can be maximized either <br />by providing such parking in City-operated garages or by keeping private lots open for general <br />public use. <br />In addition, Redwood City's transit connections, primarily Caltrain, also serve as a factor which <br />allows us to require less parking for Downtown hotels than we might for hotels in other areas. <br />Caltrain connects directly to SFO, and a portion of hotel guests will arrive in Downtown <br />Redwood City via this connection-without a car. Shared parking principles and this transit <br />connection justify setting the requirement below the current city-wide standard of 1 spacer per <br />guest room and below the ITE rate (based on suburban conditions with no transit, density, or <br />mixed use) of 0.89 spaces per guest room. <br />Here is how some other surveyed materials\deal with hotel parking: <br />Sample Minimum Parking Requirements for Hotels <br /> Stalls per <br /> uest room <br /> 1.0 <br /> 1.2 <br /> 0.89 <br /> 0.5 <br /> 0.9 <br /> 1.0 <br />It is recommended that we adopt 0.5 spaces per guest room as Downtown's minimum parking <br />requirement for hotels. Any restaurants, convention halls, or other commercial space in a <br />proposed hotel should be separated out and its parking requirement calculated independently <br />based on commercial requirements. <br />This rate of 0.5 spaces per guest room should only be permitted, however, for hotel <br />developments that contribute to shared parking efficiencies. This can be accomplished either by <br />"PtJie 2~ <br />"_._-- . ..- .- ----.---.- .'. ,-._.._p _._..._.__........_u ..._.._.._..._ - --..--.--.... --.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.