Laserfiche WebLink
said NO. Do not want this council packing the planning commision. <br />+1 They should most definitely wait until after the November election to appoint anew <br />planning commissioner.#5 <br />+1 5 We have been on the wrong side of bad deals made by recent Planning Commissioners. <br />We receive little in terms of police, fire, and infrastructure for the sweet deals. @ <br />+1 5 hopefully the new council will appoint someone that wants to slowdown development. <br />+1 5, One question that needs to be asked of all council candidates and also Planning <br />Commissioner candidates. Do they know what FAR (Floor Area Ratio), Lot Coverage and <br />Density of Lots means. What is the difference between FAR and Lot Coverage and how they <br />relate to the Lot Size. <br />4 as long as the community is encouraged to walk. The traffic and parking is absolutely <br />unequivocally difficult and not worth going <br />5 wait! We need fresh blood in house, let's wait until we get some to decide on such an <br />important position <br />I'm with the proponents on this one I'm quite sure some of their agendas haven't been done on <br />schedule. <br />Assuming the candidates elected in this November election best represent the redwood City <br />people, I feel it would be wise to wait on the planning commissioner. 5. <br />5 (several candidates are also planning commissioners and would need to be replaced). <br />5 -yes, the newly elected members should shape / influence who fills the vacant position. <br />4 Support waiting to fill vacancy until after November election <br />5 hoping for more Democrats <br />