Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.C. - Page 50 <br />increases in revenues they will seek, in response to rapidly increasing pension costs. Where <br />projected pension costs are disclosed, they are often based on Ca1PERS projections for returns on <br />investment that some experts argue are optimistic, and residents are not apprised of the potential <br />for far greater costs should another recession occur, or other Ca1PERS assumptions prove <br />inaccurate. <br />The steps necessary to address the pension crisis are unpleasant to think about, much less <br />implement. Indeed, some of the Cities have advised the Grand Jury that, while important, <br />amortization of Unfunded Liabilities must be balanced against "other priorities" for new <br />spending. 189 While the Grand Jury understands the desire on the part of the Cities to expand city <br />services in these times of economic growth and increasing property tax revenues, it is difficult to <br />think of a more important issue for the Cities to focus on than the looming pension crisis. <br />Currently, the county enjoys good economic conditions. Its unemployment rate recently dropped <br />to 2.1 percent. 190 Many of the Cities are experiencing rising revenues. 191 If the Cities do not <br />address Unfunded Liabilities in a decisive way now, when will they ever be able to? The next <br />recession may well reduce Ca1PERS' Returns on Investment below their projected level, <br />resulting in even larger Unfunded Liabilities and higher pension costs. The next recession may <br />also reduce or eliminate the Cities' budget surpluses, making it harder for them to cope. 192 Now <br />is the time for the Cities to engage their residents in the issue and, with the residents' support, <br />take the difficult actions necessary to secure a bright future for their communities. <br />FINDINGS <br />F1. Each City's CAFR for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015, June 30, 2016 and June 30, <br />2017 reported covered payroll for the City's pension plans in the amount set forth beside its <br />name for that year in Appendix A. <br />F2. Each City's CAFR for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015, June 30, 2016 and June 30, <br />2017 reported contribution payments to Ca1PERS on the City's pension plans in the <br />amount set forth beside its name for that year in Appendix A. <br />F3. Each City's CAFR for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015, June 30, 2016 and June 30, <br />2017 reported Unfunded Liabilities (as defined in this report) for the City's pension plans <br />in the amount set forth beside its name for that year in Appendix A. Each City has been <br />required to make large Amortization Cost (as defined in this report) payments of principal <br />and interest to Ca1PERS on those Unfunded Liabilities. These payments have diverted <br />money that could otherwise have been used to provide public services or to add to reserves. <br />189 Interviews by Grand Jury. <br />190 Glover, Mark, California sets a new record for lowest unemployment rate, The Sacramento Bee, January 19, <br />2018, <www.sacbee.com/news/business/article/195571634.html>. <br />191 See footnote 125 above. <br />192 Redwood City notes that the current expansion phase of the economy has now lasted for eight years, and that, <br />historically, expansionary cycles only last an average of five years. It cautions that the economy is in a "late stage of <br />expansion" and that prudent long-term budgeting requires the city to "proactively prepare for future recessionary <br />impacts that loom in the future." Redwood City, Report - FY2017-18 Mid -Year Budget Study Session, p. 11. <br />2017-2018 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 36 <br />