Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.A. - Page 16 <br />with Downtown Precise Plan Historic Resource Preservation Regulations. If the <br />report concludes that the proposed project would not meet the Secretary of the <br />Interior's Standards, the report shall discuss in detail alternatives to the proposed <br />project which would reduce significant impacts on historic resources. <br />(3) Geotechnical report <br />(4) Phase I and, if warranted by Phase 1, a Phase II environmental site <br />assessment (ESA). <br />(5) Description of any hazardous materials that may be used or stored on-site (if <br />more than typical office or household supplies). <br />(6) Asbestos, PCB, and lead-based paint survey (for demolition). <br />(7) Storm water treatment plan per City requirements (including C.3 worksheet). <br />(8) Noise assessment (generation and exposure). <br />(9) Traffic impact study (TIA) with Existing, Existing Plus Project, Background No <br />Project, Background Plus Project, Cumulative No Project, and Cumulative Plus <br />Project scenarios. <br />(10) Estimates of water demand and wastewater generation per City Engineering <br />requirements (plus will -serve letters). <br />In addition to the technical studies that shall be provided by the project applicant, <br />City will provide to Consultant written comments from the City's Plan Review <br />Committee (PRC), as well as the Architectural Advisory Committee (AAC) and <br />Historical Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC) as required by the Downtown <br />Precise Plan, respectively, which shall serve as components of the substantial <br />evidence necessary to tier off of the certified Downtown Precise Plan Environmental <br />Impact Report. <br />Project -Specific Technical Analyses Prepared by Consultant: Consultant will <br />prepare the following technical analyses and incorporate the work into the <br />Administrative Draft Supplemental EIR: <br />(a) Air quality, toxic air contaminants (TACs), and greenhouse gas (GHG) <br />emissions/climate change evaluation per Bay Area Air Quality Management District <br />(BAAQMD) CEQA Guidelines. Based on recent CEQA case law, the evaluation will <br />also address projected energy consumption (including from vehicle travel) and the <br />resulting emissions, based on CEQA Guidelines Appendix F (Energy Conservation). <br />Air Quality and Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs)- The air quality analysis will describe <br />the existing local and regional air quality conditions in the project vicinity; the federal, <br />state, and BAAQMD regulations applicable to the project; and the Redwood City <br />REV: 07-13-16 RL <br />Page 15 of 17 <br />ATTYIAGR.2016.1841Moore, lacofano, Goltsman Inc. <br />