My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2018 8:39:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 5:49:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/10/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.B. - Page 19 <br />Once the goods and services with the highest potential for <br />savings have been identified, the PD's buyers should <br />negotiate leveraged contract with vendors, achieving <br />maximum savings through discounting. <br />9. Distribute and Report In a volume -based discount contract, discounts are based on <br />Discounts to the Cities on the total sales in a given accounting period. Often, discounts <br />a Consistent Basis take the form of a rebate; however, the exact specifications <br />will depend on the product and the contract. <br />The PD should develop the tools to effectively report and <br />distribute discounts to cities. <br />While implementing the changes necessary to allow C -CPC will come at a cost, the benefits <br />accrued from crossing these checkpoints will go to great lengths to address the current <br />"dysfunction" in the PD, in addition to the potential savings from C-CPC.72 The County's <br />Purchasing Compliance Committee identified in "Purchasing Redesign Report, Procurement of <br />Goods" 48 deviations from best practices and issued 84 recommendations for improving the <br />County's procurement process. Notable findings included: <br />1. "It is unclear who is supposed to monitor the purchasing process."73 <br />2. "Departments and Purchasing Unit staff sometimes go around purchasing procedures but <br />there is no way to know when this happens; when it is discovered there is no follow up or <br />action taken and is not clear who should take that action or when."74 <br />3. "Staff often do not know that processes, rules, and regulations exist."75 <br />4. "Written documents such as handbooks, reference tools and other materials have not been <br />updated, sometimes for more than 10 years"76 <br />5. "There are no methods to monitor if the County is receiving the best value or if purchases <br />are consistent from one department to another (maybe one department is paying more <br />than another for the same item)."77 <br />6. "There is no system in place to know if/when current processes either save the County <br />money or lose money. ,78 <br />7. "No data is collected and used to monitor performance of the overall purchasing <br />process. ,79 <br />8. "We have no way of knowing if we are being fiscally responsible."80 <br />72 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury, <br />73 Ibid. 18. <br />74 Ibid. 18. <br />75 Ibid. 18. <br />76 Ibid. 20. <br />77 Ibid. 19. <br />78 Ibid. 19. <br />79 Ibid. 20. <br />80 Ibid. 19. <br />"San Mateo County Procurement Division Recommendations Follow -Up": 4. <br />2017-2018 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.