|
ECONorthwest
<br />ECONOMICS - FINANCE - PLANNING
<br />DATE: February 12, 2018
<br />TO: Matthew Arnold, Erica Stromeier of SERA Architects
<br />FROM: Matthew Craigie, Angelica True
<br />SUBJECT: REDWOOD CITY PARKS PROJECT - URBAN PARKS AND REAL ESTATE VALUES
<br />To help inform Redwood City's Parks Assessment Project, ECONorthwest reviewed research
<br />related to the effect of urban parks on real estate property values. SERA Architects, the lead
<br />consultant on the project, asked ECONorthwest to conduct this research, and to specifically look
<br />to see if there exists a positive connection between "quality" urban parks and higher real estate
<br />values. This brief document summarizes our findings.
<br />Research Findings
<br />We found several studies that indicate that there exists a relationship between parks, parklands,
<br />or open space with higher real estate values. In the studies that we reviewed, proximity to
<br />parklands generally led to higher property values, but the documented magnitude of this effect
<br />varied widely from study to study. Crompton (2005) conducted a similar literature review of
<br />park studies and concluded that properties abutting or fronting a passive park could see as
<br />much as a 20 percent increase in their values. In our review of individual studies, findings were
<br />more conservative. For example, Wachter and Wong (2008) estimated that tree plantings in
<br />Philadelphia led to only a seven to 11 percent increase in home sales prices from 1998 to 2003.
<br />In a 2009 report from the Trust for Public Land, Harnik and Welle surveyed a wide range of
<br />studies on the value of urban parks. Their report identified seven influence factors from parks
<br />that can be enumerated—property tax, tourism, direct use, community cohesion, clean water,
<br />and clean air. Foremost, their report estimated that an urban park, on average, adds
<br />approximately five percent to the value of homes within a 500 -foot radius of a park. Parks with
<br />exceptional recreational facilities, they found, may contribute as much as 15 percent to home
<br />values, whereas problematic parks (those that are poorly maintained or neglected) may subtract
<br />as much as five percent.
<br />Their report went on to estimate that the Washington D.C. urban park system, for example,
<br />generated nearly seven million additional dollars in property tax revenue for the District of
<br />Columbia in 2006.
<br />Regarding tourism, their report estimated a positive linkage between parks and increased
<br />tourist spending. Their report found that in San Diego, 20 percent of tourists visited a local park
<br />in 2006, and that 22 percent of these visitors came to San Diego specifically to visit its parks.
<br />Harnik and Welle estimated that additional tourist spending related to park trips contributed
<br />around 40 million dollars to the local economy.
<br />ECONorthwest I Portland I Seattle I Eugene I Boise I econw.com
<br />24 SEPTEMBER 2018
<br />The report also found that urban park systems enable individuals to save on health costs. A
<br />study surveyed in the report estimated that in 2006 alone, the Sacramento park system saved
<br />nearly 20 million dollars in individual health costs as result of the urban park system.
<br />Lastly, Harnik and Welle's report showed that urban park systems allow a city to save on
<br />stormwater costs and also provide other environmental benefits. The report estimated that the
<br />City of Philadelphia saved approximately six million dollars in stormwater management costs
<br />due to runoff reduction from its park systems in 2006. Related to environmental benefits, the
<br />report estimated that that Washington D.C.'s urban park system yielded nearly 20 million
<br />dollars in air pollution removal value in the same year.
<br />The results from other studies on the value of urban parks was more mixed. One relevant study,
<br />Wu, Xu, and Alig (2015), concluded that open space conservation can either increase or decrease
<br />total property values. If open spaces and parks are poorly suited to the needs of the community,
<br />increased conservation of open space can divert funding from other municipal services, lead to
<br />a higher property tax rate, a lower level of municipal services, and lower total property values.
<br />Only parks well-suited for their local community will lead to an increase in total property
<br />values and mitigate negative fiscal impacts, they argue.
<br />Some studies did show that proximity to an open space area or park may have a negative effect
<br />on real estate values. Hicks and Queen (2016) studied how the proximity to historic monument
<br />areas in Williamsburg, Virginia, affected home sales prices and surmised that there may be a
<br />disamenity effect associated with the noise and crowds these areas attract. They found that sales
<br />prices were higher for properties near but not adjacent to a historic monument. They found
<br />similar results for proximity to a golf course, resource protection area, or park, but the negative
<br />effects were not significant. However, it is important to note that parks can generate
<br />disamenities, such as noise or higher crime rates.
<br />While a close proximity to open spaces and parklands was generally shown to have a positive
<br />effect on property values, several studies indicated that this positive effect decays quickly for
<br />properties located farther away from the open space. Cho et. al. (2010) estimated that, on
<br />average, "after buffer radii of 2.2 and 1.5 miles, the positive marginal values attributed to
<br />additional developed open space and forest -land open space, respectively, approach zero"
<br />Similarly, Hicks and Queen found that a small increase in distance away from an open space led
<br />to a large decrease in a home's sale price ($1,400 to $2,000).
<br />One common element that was prevalent in many of the studies we reviewed was that the
<br />impact of an open space or park on real estate values must be considered on a case-by-case
<br />basis. In a 2005 review of more than 60 studies on the value of open space, McConnell and Walls
<br />concluded that it may be difficult for policymakers to rely on existing research to estimate the
<br />dollar value of an open space. The impact will depend heavily upon the design of the study, the
<br />needs of the community, and the design of the open space or park. 00
<br />D
<br />1
<br />sv
<br />ECONorthwest 2 0
<br />159 Iv
<br />
|