Laserfiche WebLink
ECONorthwest <br />ECONOMICS - FINANCE - PLANNING <br />DATE: February 12, 2018 <br />TO: Matthew Arnold, Erica Stromeier of SERA Architects <br />FROM: Matthew Craigie, Angelica True <br />SUBJECT: REDWOOD CITY PARKS PROJECT - URBAN PARKS AND REAL ESTATE VALUES <br />To help inform Redwood City's Parks Assessment Project, ECONorthwest reviewed research <br />related to the effect of urban parks on real estate property values. SERA Architects, the lead <br />consultant on the project, asked ECONorthwest to conduct this research, and to specifically look <br />to see if there exists a positive connection between "quality" urban parks and higher real estate <br />values. This brief document summarizes our findings. <br />Research Findings <br />We found several studies that indicate that there exists a relationship between parks, parklands, <br />or open space with higher real estate values. In the studies that we reviewed, proximity to <br />parklands generally led to higher property values, but the documented magnitude of this effect <br />varied widely from study to study. Crompton (2005) conducted a similar literature review of <br />park studies and concluded that properties abutting or fronting a passive park could see as <br />much as a 20 percent increase in their values. In our review of individual studies, findings were <br />more conservative. For example, Wachter and Wong (2008) estimated that tree plantings in <br />Philadelphia led to only a seven to 11 percent increase in home sales prices from 1998 to 2003. <br />In a 2009 report from the Trust for Public Land, Harnik and Welle surveyed a wide range of <br />studies on the value of urban parks. Their report identified seven influence factors from parks <br />that can be enumerated—property tax, tourism, direct use, community cohesion, clean water, <br />and clean air. Foremost, their report estimated that an urban park, on average, adds <br />approximately five percent to the value of homes within a 500 -foot radius of a park. Parks with <br />exceptional recreational facilities, they found, may contribute as much as 15 percent to home <br />values, whereas problematic parks (those that are poorly maintained or neglected) may subtract <br />as much as five percent. <br />Their report went on to estimate that the Washington D.C. urban park system, for example, <br />generated nearly seven million additional dollars in property tax revenue for the District of <br />Columbia in 2006. <br />Regarding tourism, their report estimated a positive linkage between parks and increased <br />tourist spending. Their report found that in San Diego, 20 percent of tourists visited a local park <br />in 2006, and that 22 percent of these visitors came to San Diego specifically to visit its parks. <br />Harnik and Welle estimated that additional tourist spending related to park trips contributed <br />around 40 million dollars to the local economy. <br />ECONorthwest I Portland I Seattle I Eugene I Boise I econw.com <br />24 SEPTEMBER 2018 <br />The report also found that urban park systems enable individuals to save on health costs. A <br />study surveyed in the report estimated that in 2006 alone, the Sacramento park system saved <br />nearly 20 million dollars in individual health costs as result of the urban park system. <br />Lastly, Harnik and Welle's report showed that urban park systems allow a city to save on <br />stormwater costs and also provide other environmental benefits. The report estimated that the <br />City of Philadelphia saved approximately six million dollars in stormwater management costs <br />due to runoff reduction from its park systems in 2006. Related to environmental benefits, the <br />report estimated that that Washington D.C.'s urban park system yielded nearly 20 million <br />dollars in air pollution removal value in the same year. <br />The results from other studies on the value of urban parks was more mixed. One relevant study, <br />Wu, Xu, and Alig (2015), concluded that open space conservation can either increase or decrease <br />total property values. If open spaces and parks are poorly suited to the needs of the community, <br />increased conservation of open space can divert funding from other municipal services, lead to <br />a higher property tax rate, a lower level of municipal services, and lower total property values. <br />Only parks well-suited for their local community will lead to an increase in total property <br />values and mitigate negative fiscal impacts, they argue. <br />Some studies did show that proximity to an open space area or park may have a negative effect <br />on real estate values. Hicks and Queen (2016) studied how the proximity to historic monument <br />areas in Williamsburg, Virginia, affected home sales prices and surmised that there may be a <br />disamenity effect associated with the noise and crowds these areas attract. They found that sales <br />prices were higher for properties near but not adjacent to a historic monument. They found <br />similar results for proximity to a golf course, resource protection area, or park, but the negative <br />effects were not significant. However, it is important to note that parks can generate <br />disamenities, such as noise or higher crime rates. <br />While a close proximity to open spaces and parklands was generally shown to have a positive <br />effect on property values, several studies indicated that this positive effect decays quickly for <br />properties located farther away from the open space. Cho et. al. (2010) estimated that, on <br />average, "after buffer radii of 2.2 and 1.5 miles, the positive marginal values attributed to <br />additional developed open space and forest -land open space, respectively, approach zero" <br />Similarly, Hicks and Queen found that a small increase in distance away from an open space led <br />to a large decrease in a home's sale price ($1,400 to $2,000). <br />One common element that was prevalent in many of the studies we reviewed was that the <br />impact of an open space or park on real estate values must be considered on a case-by-case <br />basis. In a 2005 review of more than 60 studies on the value of open space, McConnell and Walls <br />concluded that it may be difficult for policymakers to rely on existing research to estimate the <br />dollar value of an open space. The impact will depend heavily upon the design of the study, the <br />needs of the community, and the design of the open space or park. 00 <br />D <br />1 <br />sv <br />ECONorthwest 2 0 <br />159 Iv <br />