My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-09-24 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-09-24 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2018 5:18:32 PM
Creation date
9/20/2018 5:27:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/24/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. . � <br />were to lose that litigation, a judge would then decide on what district map to impose on <br />the City. <br />Adopt a Citvwide Elected Mavor and/or Change the Number of Districts <br />The City Council may opt to retain a seven -member City Council but change the <br />structure to have one Citywide elected Mayor and six by -district -elected City Council <br />Members. There is some legal question regarding whether a Citywide elected Mayor <br />violates the California Voting Rights Act, but so far the three jurisdictions challenged on <br />that point and have prevailed (Ranch Cucamonga, Palmdale and Whittier), and a study <br />by the City of Carlsbad found that roughly half of the cities that had changed to by - <br />district elections had opted for a system combining a citywide elected Mayor with by - <br />district City Council Members. <br />This could also be an opportunity for the City to change the number of Council <br />Members, if it so desires. California General Law cities can have five, seven or nine <br />Council Members (or a citywide elected Mayor and four, six or eight Council Members). <br />As a charter city, Redwood City could select one of those options or its own alternative. <br />Such a change would need to be approved by the voters as part of the proposed March <br />2020 charter revision, but the direction would preferably be given now to focus the <br />districting process on that revised number of districts. <br />Alternative Election Svstems <br />There are a variety of theoretical and actual alternative voting systems that the City can <br />consider thanks to its status as a Charter City. The most commonly mentioned are <br />"cumulative voting," "ranked choice voting," and "from district" elections. <br />In a "From District" election system, districts are drawn and candidates to represent a <br />given district must reside in that district, but the election continues to be held citywide. <br />All voters on Election Day would see one election for "District 1," one election for <br />"District 2," and so on. This system ensures each geographic region of the city is <br />represented on the City Council, while voters continue to vote for all seven City Council <br />Members and City Council Members remain accountable to voters in all parts of the city. <br />The California Voting Rights Act, however, specifically classifies "From District" systems <br />as "At Large," and thus this option does not provide a safe harbor from a lawsuit under <br />the Act. Santa Ana uses "From District" elections and is currently facing a California <br />Voting Rights Act challenge. <br />"Ranked Choice Voting," sometimes referred to as Instant Runoff Voting, is currently <br />used by San Francisco, Berkeley, Oakland and San Leandro. In theory, voters in these <br />jurisdictions rank all of the candidates running for a given office, and the votes for the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.