Laserfiche WebLink
3. Would really help if the ordinances in place were enforced ie stop the fireplaces from <br />burning especially on no burn days. Currently the ordinance is blatantly ignored <br />3 1 do believe cities our size do not have an expertise in this area and it should be more focused <br />with state and federal governments but there should be small programs that could help <br />reduce carbon emissions <br />3. I'm not against cities pitching in but it's an additional financial burden. <br />3: while I entirely support climate policy, I'm unsure what can be done effectively at a city level. <br />The city is already strained for resources, so enacting committees and hiring people for this will <br />detract from other much needed services in the city. In the other hand, I'd like to see a <br />suggested plan, how much it will cost taxpayers, and how it will impact the city in positive and <br />negative ways. After that I'd love to put in a vote. <br />The devil is in the details! <br />3 RWC should do everything appropriate to integrate with state level efforts but going further <br />would be burdensome relative to the rest of the Bay area. <br />3. If cost were no object, I'd say definitely. But we can't afford to set up a commission and <br />studies and make a plan. How about drafting a guideline and <br />3 Sounds good at first look, but Its not clear, what exactly is a climate action plan? Would it be <br />used to restrict cars on our steets? Sea rise? Limit Overbuilding? <br />3 Not sure it's necessary at the City level, if there are guidelines to be followed from the County <br />and State levels. <br />© 2018 Voca Advocacy Inc, Redwood City, California <br />