Laserfiche WebLink
6.D. - Page 4 of 70 <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. The City Council may elect not to approve the purchase of the 125 Taser Conducted Energy <br />Weapons. The less -lethal weapon options of the Police Department would be adversely <br />impacted because the Department's current inventory of Conducted Energy Weapons have <br />exceeded their five-year service life and need to be replaced. <br />2. Council may direct staff to conduct a separate competitive bid process to purchase the 125 Taser <br />Conducted Energy Weapons. Conducting a separate competitive bid process would likely not <br />result in any cost savings because the Public Procurement Authority's process included the same <br />criteria and requirements that a Redwood City competitive bid requires but has the benefit of <br />volume pricing. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />1. Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing Agreement <br />2. Second Amendment to Law Enforcement Equipment Master Price Agreement <br />3. Notice of Solicitation <br />4. Public Procurement Authority <br />5. Axon Cameras & Law Enforcement Equipment <br />6. Outright Comparison Quote <br />REPORT PREPARED BY: <br />Sean Hart, Lieutenant <br />shart@redwoodcity.org <br />780-7681 <br />APPROVED BY: <br />Dan Mulholland, Police Chief <br />Melissa Stevenson Diaz, City Manager <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcitV.org <br />396 <br />