Agmt18 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.

Browse Search

REV: 07-15-2021 VR This scope of work assumes no stationary sources of equipment will need to be quantified. If the Project includes stationary sources, substantial details on the equipment will need to be provided and a budget augment may be required. A qualitative assessment of CO hotspots will be provided. If it is later determined that a quantitative assessment of CO is necessary a budget augment will be requested. Major changes to the Project features, design, schedule or other parameters that precipitate revisions to the emissions modeling may also warrant a budget augment. Changes to the Project that occur after completing the analysis that require re- modeling will be considered additional work that is not covered by this scope of work. This scope of work does not include a quantitative assessment of health risks; no dispersion modeling is proposed. If it is later determined that a quantitative assessment of health risks is required, a revised scope of work and costs will be provided for review and approval before initiating additional work. The Project is assumed to be consistent with BAAQMD and the California Air Resources Board's siting recommendations that are protective of sensitive receptors. The Project is not considered a source of substantial odors. A qualitative assessment of odors will be provided, which documents the distance to any odor sources relative to the BAAQMD's guidance. Consultant will respond to a single round of comments on the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Technical Memorandum. Data Needs The following data would assist in preparation of the analyses. If data is not available, Consultant will use default modeling assumptions and may propose timing and phasing assumptions for approval. The timing of construction, the type and number of construction equipment anticipated, and the amount of import or export of soil during construction; Sustainability Project design features that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions (i.e., energy efficiency features beyond what is required by law, use of drought tolerant plants, water reduction features, waste reduction features, etc.). Daily, Saturday, and Sunday Trip Generation rates; if a traffic study is not prepared, default ITE rates may be used. Trip lengths for proposed uses. Task assumes one round of consolidated comments by the City during review of the CEQA document. It is assumed that comments on the draft assessment will be editorial in nature and no revisions to the modeling will be required. If additional revisions to the modeling are required, this will be considered additional work and will require a budget amendment. Schedule Consultant will provide the methodology and modeling assumptions to the City for review within one week of receipt of all information needed to complete the analysis. Complete information includes at a minimum a construction schedule, approved Project Description, and trip generation. Upon approval of the methodology and assumptions, the air quality/greenhouse gas/energy assessment will be provided to the City within six weeks. ATTY/AGR.2021/Amend No. 1/Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Page 13 of 21)