AgdaPkt 2018-11-19 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

+2 1 we need housing +2 1 Newer changes are needed to accommodate growth. +2 1 I'm against any additional restrictions. If anything, I'm in favor of up zoning residential neighborhoods to encourage more multi-level, multi -family buildings. +2 1 as a homeowner I strongly oppose any laws limiting expanding my current residence because of how some residents "feel" about it. I value your sentiment but if the expansion is up to the building code and I do care about the neighborhood style not creating a freaking skyscraper it should be the homeowners decision not neighbors or the city which is actually going to be drawing additional tax property revenue from the expansion. +2 1 - Stop the NIMBYism. There is no problem other than some people don't like change. If people are really concerned they should buy their neighbors house to control change. +1 1, but requiring more off street parking/garage space with the additional sf would help the neighborhoods] Mean 1! Strongly oppose! With my prior comments. R If the house is not Historic, owners should be able to build two stories +1 2 should be reviewed on case by case basis +1 2 - there should be reasonable restrictions for height, % of lot occupied, character, privacy and potential use. Severe restrictions that limit use of land at the time of housing crisis are unacceptable. In addition to that a large % of existing houses are two old and small per current standards. +1 1 A house that wouldn't cost $50k in any other state, right across from my apartment, sold for $1.1 million. I was on the fence about Dianna Reddy until I received opposition mailers about her saying she was going to lower the value of homes by $60k. Homes in Redwood City are ridiculously overpriced compared to their relative value. It is not a virtue to have POS houses worth millions. +1 1 the bigger the house the more rooms to rent out. More cars to park in small neighborhoods. More congestion on the roads!!