My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-11-19 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-11-19 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2019 11:05:14 AM
Creation date
11/15/2018 4:19:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/19/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I the city has no say in what people do with their own property and homes. I can't see <br />anyone in their right mind supporting this <br />1. We already have enough restrictions on growth and housing. We do not need something <br />else to keep locking in and exacerbating the housing crisis. The character of these <br />neighborhoods is really not special or historic enough to justify more limitations on growth. <br />1= If necessary the owners should decide not the City, but only if it's coded as commercial <br />site. <br />1. We need more habitable space! <br />2 there should be some restrictions but this idea could lead to more housing <br />1 stop all new building in Redwood City.... improve what needs to be improved.... <br />1 We do not need this. We already have rules with regards to footprint, setbacks, etc. What we <br />absolutely do need is a change in zoning regulations that would allow multi -family <br />structures to be built alongside single-family homes. Limiting our neighborhoods to single- <br />family dwellings makes the Bay Area unaffordable and promotes McMansion development. <br />Neutral/don't know: <br />+3 3; I'll never be able to afford a home here! <br />+3 3. If it is residents building for their own preference is one thing. If it is an investor buying <br />a small single story home to build a second story big home -- then I strongly oppose this. <br />And the city should keep the single story homes to keep Redwood City affordable to small <br />families, families who want to purchase their first home. If all the homes turn into big second <br />stories it will not be affordable for residents. And now the trend is to have 1 or 2 children the <br />need for big homes won't be needed. Millennials only use one car and have one child or two. <br />They are more minimalist- so they won't be buying much of the smaller single stories. And <br />millennials are the future generation. So if it is a resident building they should be allowed to <br />build a second story. If it is an investor- they should not be able to. We need to keep a mix of <br />single and two stories to stay diverse. Opps I meant millennials will be buying the small one <br />story homes not the huge second story homes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.