Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Legislative Bill Summaries <br />TRANSPORTATION <br />S8 1404 (Machado). Vehicles. Parking Violations. Street Cleaning. S8 1404 adds Section <br />40216 to the Vehicle Code to require cities to prove street sweeping occurred on the date a street <br />sweeping violation ticket was issued. Further, this bill also declares that the regulation of parking <br />violations of an ordinance for street cleaning is in need of uniform statewide regulation. The <br />league is opposed to S8 1404 for the following reasons: <br />. S8 1404 attempts to strip away authority to enforce local ordinances for services <br /> that a city has the right to provide. Cities provide street sweeping services in <br /> accordance with local conditions and available resources. Statewide regulation of street <br /> sweeping would be a one-size-fits-all approach that doesn't reflect the uniqueness of <br /> each city, doesn't take into account the many varied street sweeping programs that exist, <br /> and doesn't give authority to local governing bodies to provide services as demanded by <br /> city residents. <br />. Under this legislation, the burden of proof is placed on a city to prove that the city <br /> provided street cleaning services on the day all parking violation notices are <br /> issued. Requiring the city to provide documentation for each street sweeping ticket is <br /> not an efficient use of city staff resources when current law already allows an individual to <br /> appeal a parking ticket to the issuing agency. <br /> In fact, Sections 40202 and 40215 of the Vehicle Code provide that a ticket may be <br /> dismissed, at the request of review, within 21 days after the issuance of a parking <br /> violation if the issuing officer or agency determines that, in the interest of justice, the <br /> notice of parking violation should be cancelled. <br />. S8 1404 puts financial burdens on cities. Many jurisdictions have tight budgets and <br /> minimum staffing. Under this legislation, staff time would be taken away from other <br /> services to residents to prove street sweeping has occurred. It can be anticipated that a <br /> city may have to devote at least one full-time staff person to meet the requirements <br /> outlined in this bill. And, even if a ticket is dismissed, a city would still have to process <br /> citations, pay for paper stock. staff time and other associated costs. <br />. S8 1404 holds cities to specific maintenance times without taking Into account <br /> other issues that may interfere with street sweeping. Issues that may effect street <br /> sweeping occurring on a designated and posted day and time include employee illness, <br /> equipment breakdown, or a city-wide emergency such as flooding, that would require <br /> diversion of personnel to meet urgent community needs. <br />. S8 1404 has the potential to set a slippery slope and could create a tendency to <br /> disregard other posted parking restrictions and laws. On the surface, it appears that <br /> this legislation is a small issue because it applies only to street sweeping. However, one <br /> could use the logic set forth in this legislation to park in a red zone (fire hydrant area), a <br /> loading area or a handicap space and contest the ticket if a fire department didn't actually <br /> need to use the fire hydrant, a delivery wasn't actually made, or a disabled person didn't <br /> need to park in the handicapped space. Additionally, one could argue that they don't <br /> have to stop at a stop sign if no cross-traffic is present. <br />Almost 80 percent of Californians live within city boundaries and have an expectation of services <br />that must be provided to maintain a clean and healthy environment. Cities should have the <br />