My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-12-17 Joint Special
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-12-17 Joint Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2018 1:26:47 PM
Creation date
12/18/2018 9:28:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/17/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
480
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5 if land is limited allow to build as high as possible <br />5 Strongly feel that we all benefit from affordable housing built on city land. PLUS, the last city <br />council did not require apt. and office developers to pay for the increased use of all city/county <br />roads, parks, schools, police and fire protection, etc. There is a term for corporations dumping <br />their costs on others. It is called "externalizing" by economists. Companies created all the jobs, <br />but dumped the social and infrastructure costs on RC citizens. <br />I have been before Building commission and the City Council to have blended housing on new <br />construction and existing multi units. You have market rate, middle income and low income <br />blended together. I am for using city property in this manner. This would include everyone. <br />People who teach our children, nurses, secretaries, police, firemen, bus boys, cooks, people who <br />clean our toilets, and the list goes on. Recently Denver did this a side. Benefit their crime rate <br />drop 48%. <br />5 this is a no -brained. RWC can partner with a housing nonprofit that can build on donated or <br />subsidized land. <br />4, as long as the rents were plowed back into city services for all residents, it's a win-win. <br />5Once you decide to support affordable housing what other choice do you have? <br />4. New development should pony up to increase availability. <br />4What land? Does the city own a bunch of land that's not being used? I'm in favor of affordable <br />housing but there isn't enough information here <br />51 totally see the argument that public land should benefit all residents. I think affordable <br />housing can be built in such a way that achieves this criterion. In some cases, the city could <br />provide temporary affordable housing options and return a profit that could be used for the <br />public fund. <br />5 Build more housing. BUILD MORE HOUSING. <br />5 - no brainer. Communities are better and stronger when they're more inclusive. Income should <br />not be an automatic barrier for living in a happy healthy community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.