Laserfiche WebLink
R 1 - CalTrain is a perfectly great mode of transportation and we shouldn't invest resource in <br />a ferry service. Wasteful. <br />R 1 increased traffic in sensitive areas bad for Nesting bird and animal habitat Lots of small <br />boats rowers on water creating unsafe conditions. <br />+1 1 - A ferry is not practical from the Peninsula to SF. It would take too long and not n <br />convenient. Where is the BART extension between San Jose & SF that we the taxpayers <br />already paid for? We have been waiting > 20 years for this. And what happened to that <br />money? <br />+1 1 "Redwood City - San Francisco ferry service would be a valuable mode of transportation <br />between the Peninsula and San Francisco." <br />+1 2 - too far from downtown and too long to get to SF would mean it would be <br />underutilized <br />+7 2 - makes more sense for east bay commutes, not to SF <br />+1 11 like the "idea" of ferry service but have heard the subsidies necessary to implement it <br />would be astronomical. And you would also have the problem of getting to and from the ferry <br />terminals which would add to the time and cost of the trip (i.e. parking). <br />R 1.1 don't want to take a ferry. Too slow and probably more costly than the train. <br />+1 1) Seaport Blvd and Woodside Rd (both the 101 exit and Woodside corridor) are already at <br />an over -capacity for traffic. The ferry idea is great, but when you factor in all the new <br />commuters/Ober drivers picking up ferry commuters added into the existing bad congestion <br />along the Seaport/Woodside corridor you're looking at a nightmare. Strongly oppose this! <br />+1 2. Train seems faster and more efficient. <br />+7 2 - A ferry service is unlikely to remove enough cars to be worth the cost, especially <br />compared to improved bus/train services and public transit usage initiatives. <br />R 21 don't see why a ferry is more worthwhile than better caltrain and bus service <br />