Laserfiche WebLink
6.G. - Page 2 of 238 <br />ANALYSIS <br />BAWSCA and SFPUC identified seven amendments of the greatest importance to each agency. These <br />include: <br />1. Oversieht of SFPUC's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (2009 WSA new Section 6.09): The <br />Wholesale Customers have had some oversight of the Water System Improvement Program <br />(WSIP), both through the enactment of AB 1823 (2002), and also through quarterly meetings and <br />public reporting. As WSIP nears completion, the SFPUC's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is <br />expanding to achieve a sustainable rate of repair and replacement consistent with overall asset <br />management of the System and SFPUC's adopted Level of Service Goals. This amendment adds a <br />new section to the WSA obligating SFPUC to formally engage with BAWSCA on its 10 -year CIP <br />development. This amendment ensures that BAWSCA and the Wholesale Customers are involved <br />in the development of the 10 -year CIP, have the opportunity to comment on proposed changes <br />to the Level of Service Goals, requires the SFPUC to create an asset management policy applicable <br />to the Regional Water System by December 31, 2020, and commits the SFPUC to quarterly <br />reporting and meetings on CIP implementation. <br />2. Tier 1 Drought Allocation Plan (2009 WSA Attachment H Section 2.1): The 1984 Agreement <br />required the SFPUC and the Wholesale Customers to develop a Shortage Allocation Plan during <br />droughts. The plan was approved in 2000 for average system wide shortages of up to 20%. Under <br />the plan, the SFPUC allocates the available water supply during droughts between Retail and <br />Wholesale Customers (the "Tier 1 allocation") for incremental shortages of 5, 10, 15 and 20 <br />percent. The Wholesale Customers then collectively allocate the wholesale portion of the <br />available supply among themselves (the "Tier 2 allocations"). <br />Various factors that affect this formula have changed since 2009, particularly the proportionate <br />purchases from the System from San Francisco Retail and Wholesale Customers. If the Tier 1 <br />allocation had been applied during the 2014-2017 drought, Retail Customers would have received <br />a positive allocation of water. The Tier 1 Drought Allocation Plan amendment includes a modest <br />change to the existing formula to ensure that, in the event of a cutback, San Francisco Retail <br />Customers do not receive a positive allocation of water and will take a minimum 5% cutback. Any <br />positive allocation of water would be re -distributed to Wholesale Customers; additional water <br />conserved by Retail Customers up to the minimum 5% level would remain in storage for allocation <br />in future successive dry years. <br />3. 2018 Decisions (2009 WSA Sections 3.13, 4.01, 4.05, 4.06, 9.06, Attachment Q): The 1984 <br />Agreement memorialized the perpetual 184 million gallons per day "Supply Assurance" to the <br />Wholesale Customers which survives the expiration or termination of the 2009 Agreement. The <br />Supply Assurance is subject to reduction due to drought, emergencies and system <br />maintenance/malfunction. The Wholesale Customers have allocated shares of the Supply <br />Assurance called "Individual Supply Guarantees." <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.ore <br />333 <br />