My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2001-06-25 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC Min 2001-06-25 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:36:24 PM
Creation date
3/12/2002 10:42:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/25/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A brief overview of the history on the issue was given. The goal now is to address the <br /> possibility of using a different approach to resolving the Redwood Shores Levee Trail <br /> System via Ruben Barralas who is in Washington. <br /> Members of the levee committee stated that what is significant is that the empirical data <br /> shows that the clapper rail is thriving in various areas namely areas where there is public <br /> access and dogs wander. Consequently, people and animals seem to have a benign <br /> influence in this particular population. If the evidence is that the clapper rail can thrive and <br /> public access is not destructive it is the duty of the Council to make sure this is allowed. <br /> Similarly, a very reasonable solution is to have a guard that will open the gates in the <br /> morning and close them at night. <br /> <br /> M/S Claire/Ira to extend the meeting until 11:15 p.m. <br /> Motion passed by a unanimous voice call vote. <br /> <br /> One member of the levee committee dissented from the proposal made by the other <br /> committee members. It was explained that in the past there had been some preliminary <br /> agreement but the main objection is that the City has been dealing with local entities and <br /> the proper channels at the Fish and Wildlife level. It was mentioned that to go to <br /> Washington is to go straight to the top. The previous approach in negotiations had been to <br /> go to the Fish and Wildlife and see if our needs and demands are acquiesced, but this new <br /> approach is entirely different because we are going over the heads of local agencies. <br /> Additionally, and because of the record of the current administration when it comes to <br /> environmental issues, some council members could not in good conscience take this route. <br /> Some council members had serious concerns about the environmental validity and <br /> soundness of a decision made at this top level. <br /> <br /> Robin Smith President of the Sequoia Audubon Society gave an update on the rail <br /> population at the Redwood Shores. The results of the most recent counts show that the <br /> birds are using the area for refugia. Ms. Smith further stated that apparently the birds are <br /> feeling more comfortable and reproducing. Ms. Smith also said that the proposed approach <br /> is not appropriate and the birds still need the protection. <br /> <br /> Mike Spence stated that it is sad that not many people show up to discuss such an <br /> important matter. Mr. Spence came to thank the Mayor and the Council about their <br /> decision to protect the clapper rail. While it has been a long arduous project, the reality is <br /> that nature is being protected and it is important for Council to stand by previous sound <br /> decisions. Mike Spence stated that many good things are happening in this City, i.e. <br /> revitalization of Redwood City, and being environmentally minded is a very important <br /> thing. <br /> <br /> Ralph Nobles believes that after much studying and research, if the Fish and Wildlife <br /> wants the City to block public access then we should respect their decision and not try to <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ~ JUNE 25, 2001 <br />MINUTES PAGE 15 <br /> MINUTES Book No. 58 <br /> Page No. 451 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.