My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2001-06-25 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC Min 2001-06-25 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:36:24 PM
Creation date
3/12/2002 10:42:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/25/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
override their position. The most important issue is to protect wildlife and it is not wise to <br /> go to the Bush administration and ask Ruben Morales to act on our behalf but against the <br /> environment. Mr. Nobles stated that this approach is not appropriate. <br /> <br /> Some council members stated that the City of Redwood City should approach the <br /> administration because it was not a fair negotiation the first time around. Some council <br /> members also stated that it is not unreasonable to make the request to the Administration <br /> and if this is not a successful effort for environmental reasons then we just accept the <br /> response. <br /> <br /> Other Council members wondered about the ramifications of this approach at the local <br /> level and how it would impact further negotiations between the City and Wildlife. Some <br /> Council Members responded that this type of approach would not be beneficial or <br /> favorable to our local relations with Fish and Wildlife. <br /> <br /> M/S Claire/Ira to extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m. <br /> The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote by those present. <br /> <br /> Council also shared concerns that this will set a precedent in the Bay area and other areas <br /> of the 400 miles coastline may be closed in other cities because of what happened in our <br /> City. It was said that the City does not want to be setting a precedent and jeopardizing <br /> other communities access to bayfront. <br /> <br /> Council also discussed concem about leapfrogging over Fish and Wildlife and going to the <br /> capital. Some Council members stated that this is not a wise choice, Other Council <br /> Members clarified that talking to Ruben Morales might be a positive experience because it <br /> will bring awareness to how long it takes to get a permit for the levees. Council also <br /> believes that Ruben Morales will be able to address the issue with objectivity, and bring <br /> awareness to the current process and possibly better the situation for other communities. <br /> <br /> M/S Jordan/Hartnett Motion to arrange for another hearing at the Secretary's level <br /> to address our concerns, incorporating the Consultant Terri Hoffman in the process <br /> by having him reevaluate, strengthen and advocate the position of the City in this <br /> matter. <br /> Yes - Hartnett, Howard, Ira, Jordan. <br /> No - Pierce, Claire, Ruskin <br /> The motion passed by 4 to 3 roll call vote. <br /> <br /> C. Tariff 7 and Redwood City Waterway Enforcement Recommendations; MO 01-98 <br /> Recommendation: (309) <br /> Consider adoption of Police Department recommendations pertaining to the <br /> following issues: <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 25, 2001 <br />MINUTES PAGE 16 <br />MINUTES Book No. 58 <br />Page No. 452 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.