Laserfiche WebLink
7.C. - Page 4 of 11 <br />the project that would be reduced to a less than significant level through mitigation, all of which are <br />summarized below. <br />Significant and Unavoidable Impacts: <br />1. Transportation and Circulation: Development of the project would add traffic to already <br />impacted intersections and cause vehicle delays to worsen substantially. The Applicant would be <br />required to contribute its fair share to traffic improvements and implement mitigation measures, <br />however, these payments and improvements do not result in reducing traffic impacts and <br />intersection delays to a level that would be considered less than significant. Some of the impacted <br />corridors are under Caltrans's control and due to uncertain funding and approval, improvements <br />are not guaranteed to be constructed. <br />Less than Significant Impacts with Mitigation: <br />1. Air Quality: Construction of the project would generate air pollutant emissions. Mitigation <br />measures were identified to follow standard BAAQMD construction mitigation measures <br />Implementation of these mitigation measures will reduce this impact to less than significant. <br />2. Biological Resources: Construction activities, including pile driving, grading and vegetation <br />removal, may impact trees, nesting birds, roosting bats, and aquatic species, and could impact <br />wetlands. Mitigation measures were identified which would reduce these impacts to less than <br />significant. <br />3. Cultural Resources: There is the potential to uncover archaeological, paleontological and <br />unknown tribal resources during the course of construction. Mitigation measures were identified, <br />which would require specified measures to be taken if artifacts are discovered. These mitigation <br />measures would reduce impacts to less than significant. <br />4. Hazardous Materials: Construction of the project could result in the accidental release of <br />hazardous materials during grading activities. Mitigation measures were identified which require <br />construction work -plans and health and safety plans to reduce these impacts to less than <br />significant. <br />5. Hydrology and Water Quality: The project could exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater infrastructure. Installation of new pumps at the Oddstad and Seaport Pump Stations <br />and new stormwater mains would reduce this impact to less than significant. <br />6. Noise: Construction activities would result in substantial temporary noise in excess of standards <br />in the project vicinity. A mitigation measure was identified to implement best management <br />practices during construction which reduces this impact to less than significant. <br />Cumulative Impacts. The Draft EIR evaluated the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project <br />with all past, present, and pending development projects in the area. The analysis concludes that the <br />proposed project would contribute to significant cumulative impacts; specifically cumulative air quality <br />impacts and cumulative intersection and freeway operations impacts. <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.ore <br />231 <br />