Laserfiche WebLink
fees and required mitigations. They are giving the City and it's residents nothing but a huge <br />development which will further clog 101 and the 84 interchange with 6000 employees and adding to <br />traffic congestion. This development is commercial office. <br />Neutral: <br />3. Traffic is already bad there. We need more affordable housing, not more corporate offices. <br />3. Support services like child care need to be developed there to support more office space, so <br />employees aren't adding to traffic. <br />3 suppose the project along as the plan considers traffic flow in and around the area. <br />3 need to know a lot more to support <br />3 traffic is already a mess. Adding more commuters isn't going to help. <br />3. There has been so much growth in Redwood City lately without there seeming to be any plan for the <br />additional traffic. I am concerned about the effect that this will have on 101 as well as 84. I'm also <br />concerned about the additional burden on the downtown area, where many people are likely to go to <br />lunch. <br />If the Harbor View project is passed, the Woodside exits and entrances off of and onto 101 should be <br />examined and modernized. <br />3. Redoing the woodside road exit south and that interchange is the vital part of this project to me. <br />Southbound (particularly going West) it is the worst exit on all of 101. 1 need more detail, not just a dollar <br />figure contribution, regarding how that interchange will be fixed to support this. <br />3- only if they are not building over the Bay, or over land that could become healthy wetlands. However, I <br />believe a community should have enough offices and housing to avoid commuting, and Redwood City is <br />still in need of both. <br />© 2017 Voca Advocacy Inc. Redwood City, California <br />