Laserfiche WebLink
+1 1 -the idea is good BUT lets fix the traffic congestion FIRST @Woodside road and 101!!Priorities <br />Priorities <br />+1 1 strongly oppose because the original proposal included "water access for kayaking, etc" but now <br />none?! Also there are tons of office/commercial space in the same area and it is mostly empty along <br />Seaport. <br />1 - tell these out of towners bye bye <br />1 -stop building and preserve open space. This area can be revitalized as a place for families to go to for <br />recreation. A few restaurants and shops, but leave it the way it is. <br />1 there will be too much traffic the roads can't handle the traffic. Need to work on infrastructure first. <br />Also would be better to build more housing rather than more office buildings. <br />2 adds to our current traffic nightmare <br />1. Strongly opposed. The sea level is rising. We should not be developing so close 2 the bay. Plus it's <br />already very congested there! <br />1 traffic is bad already <br />2. 1 support responsible development but rampant building will cause more congestion and overloading <br />of Redwood City's resources. The character of the town is changing from family friendly to tall buildings <br />darkening the streets. <br />1 traffic is not ready for that <br />1Harbor View was bought in an IR zoning, which allows for 50% office, not 100% office as submitted. The <br />property owner, Jay Paul Corp. knew this when he purchased the land. Thinking he could spot zone was <br />a risk HE took, not one the city should take. Work within the parameters that our zoning allows for, it's a <br />fairly simple concept. <br />1. What are the plans for the traffic on Woodside. <br />1. We need affordable housing, not more offices. <br />1 this would require people to be kicked out of their homes. So no for me. <br />