My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-06-05
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-06-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2006 11:29:01 AM
Creation date
6/1/2006 3:05:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
6/5/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />88 <br /> <br />city's ability to secure the best bond rating possible. Pursuant to the Plan. the City Council Page 2 <br />conceptually approved a water rate increase to take effect July 1, 2005. The Financing <br />Plan delineated in detail the amount of annual new revenues that will be required to meet <br />the repayment requirements of the first bond issue: $2.1 million in total. The rate increase <br />required on July 1, 2005 equaled an across-the-board increase to all customer <br />classifications of 12%. <br /> <br />In early March 2005, the Utilities Committee (comprised of Council members Foust, Ira, <br />and Pierce) met and adopted a process whereby staff would elicit community input before <br />the Committee considered specific options for how rates will be increased. To that end, a <br />community roundtable was held in April 2005, facilitated by the Civic Engagement and <br />Facilitation Program of the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center. In the course of the <br />evening, the participants generated a considerable volume of input and ideas, drawn from <br />their reactions to three different approaches for water rate increases. The overarching <br />guidelines that the Committee applied to their June 2005 recommendation to the full <br />Council were: <br />. A refinement of the Water Enterprise Guiding Principles <br />. A hybrid approach to rate increases based on community input that was further <br />refined to insure that billing impacts for various customer classifications reflect the <br />Committee's desire for equity and conservation <br />. Confirmation that budgeted expenditures and projected revenues are in balance <br />. Analysis of benchmarking average water bills on the Peninsula - which <br />demonstrates that despite this significant increase, Redwood City remains one of <br />the most cost-effective water retailers <br /> <br />On June 6,2005, the City Council approved the following adjustments to water rates and <br />charges, as recommended by the Committee: <br />. Increased the residential monthly Basic Service Charge from $11.56 to $12.00. <br />. Increased consumption rates from 4% on the life line to 47% on the upper-most rate <br />tiers for large users. <br /> <br />For the proposed adjustments in rates and charges to take effect August 4, 2006, the <br />Utilities Committee has considered the 2005 public input - prior to and subsequent to - the <br />approval of rate increases, and has provided direction to staff on the following basis: <br />. Begin and complete the 2006 rate adjustment process before the affected 60-day <br />billing cycle commences, so that public concerns and comments are heard and <br />considered ahead of the period for which water bills may increase (August 4, 2006). <br />. Consider the full scope of 2005 public comments and input as fully valid and <br />applicable to Council deliberations for the 2006 adjustments. <br />. Through a continued public hearing (open the hearing April 3 and close it June 5), <br />provide ample time for interested community members to ask questions, provide <br />comments and express concerns on proposed rates and charges increases. <br />. Consider a phased-in shift of debt services costs from water bill "variable" costs <br />(supported by consumption rates) to "fixed" costs (supported by the Basic Service <br />Charge), as revenue bond proceeds are expended on new facilities and recycled <br />water begins to be produced and distributed. The recommended portion of costs to <br />be initially shifted to the Basic Service Charge is 25%. <br />. Be mindful of the need to continue to affect conservation practices by utilizing a <br />tiered, conservation rate structure. Monitor the ratio of revenues derived from rates <br />and from the fixed monthly service charge. The emerging rule-of-thumb in the <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.