Laserfiche WebLink
6.H.- Page 8of8 <br />6.3.A. - Page 2 <br />the Police Department will be able to reduce the amount of property stored by instituting <br />a disposal process approximately 25% more efficient than the one in use today. <br />Amending RCMC Chapter 2 Article VI will also remove the conflict between the <br />municipal code and California Welfare and Institutions Code Section 217, which was <br />updated subsequent to the passage of Chapter 2 Article VI, that requires unclaimed <br />property be held for a minimum of 90 days prior to being donated to a qualifying <br />organization. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The City Council could choose not to authorize the ordinance change. The selection of <br />this alternative would likely require contracting for offsite storage, a new expense for <br />which funding has not been identified. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />There is no fiscal impact if the ordinance change is approved. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />The proposed action is not a "project" for purposes of CEQA, as that term is defined in <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and does not require environmental review. <br />.JOHN GUNDERSON <br />POLICE LIEUTENANT <br />&-U,v,LU <br />DAN MULHOLLAND <br />CHIEF OF POLICE <br />MELISSA STEVENSON DIAZ <br />CITY MANAGER <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />1. Ordinance Amending Article VI of Chapter 2 of the Redwood City Municipal <br />Code (Unclaimed Property) <br />105 <br />