AgdaPkt 2019-02-25 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1) No wa\,! RVv, car traffic is at its most congested EVER thanks to RWC city council decisions to add a tor: of new condos=more commuters (taking away our precious community resource of our roller skating rink to Co so by re -zoning it for condos!), so now RWC council cannot turn around and decide to impact car traffic even further by more construction/narrowing on EI Camino! Council added rr:o�e r�onle, yru better believe we're gonre need every inch of EI Camino for that increased car traffic. S!IF;r to thin': all these new residents are BIKE RIDERS - wishful thinking, RWC! 2 am conflicted. As a commuter cyclist I believe cars and cyclists need to learn how to interact safely ar,.J ap:.ror riataly on the streets, as is the case in many European countries. Fully separated cycle lanes therefore aren't ideal. But EI Camino is a cyclist death trap right now, as drivers pay no attention to :i er M and do not share tha roads. However, partiai protection also means there's still no protection c'::ee blocks north- look at the terrible inconsistent cycle lane infrastructure on Midr ",efis!d it Palo Alm and Menlo Park as an object lesson. Definitely support to make it safer for pedestrians. 1. EI Camino Real should not be for bike traffic. Neu � �•� � :�c.:...: ,c�� R � a d=per..-Is on what they want to do. I'm all for everyone being safe but at the same time peop!e drivin � need to be able to get where they are going. The current situation to go downtown or ge arrunc. 1s not acceptable any way you choose to get there. +2 3. i don't t:-Jnk we need one sac of concrete on ECR tnat removes parking or slows traffic no matter what c, --e goal �s +2 . - _ :: .3 : Mo- ah infor; natio.. o rapport this. i can't access the web site you shoe,,. +2 - _susnc.,3 cn the -ost and how mi ch disruption it will cause and for how long. It also depends on F --Ai they are going to improve it. For example, are they proposing to add bike lanes or remove stre:_t o 'kin:. s .cc :, :.r'. nowns cc suppor c or oppose at the -,Moment. +2 is cavinc f- this? We've been told by RWC that we'll have a huge deficit for years to Corr _ _ _u.I _ 1:rease i,, c,, s:c n a psis CGst and of-.st is priority compared tc other projects? +1 ;. 1 -,le no- read tr,= ECR Corridor Plan (I suspect this is true of most respondents). If people resp . ,c on'- 3 sF.:.uld have the I� raest amount if respinses.