My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-02-25 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-02-25 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:15:52 AM
Creation date
2/21/2019 5:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/25/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
486
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
+1 3 i sup^ort changes 'oecause something has tc be done to protect peresc-ans ar•c. •_yaisis. The <br />changes in those plans are a good step in the rignt directic`t. 4o\vever, i nave two nnajor concerns <br />that needs to oa adressed before i can get behind any changes. The first is that I'm not sure I see <br />much improvement to protect pedestrians and cyclists crossing ECR. Also, I can't get behind <br />char Eggs t' .at don't address traffic flow, specifical'v the ti. ing of lights. There '�alre tc 're pa. i -ds <br />when cars -an get from Jerfersc;n to Oak hitting at most one red light. Menio Pan, clto something <br />similar. I can regularly go from Roble to Valparaiso without hitting a single light! <br />I'm going to pass on voting on this one. I've looked at the charts but without seeing larger <br />renditions and having somebodywaik me through it I don't think I'm <br />3 While I don't have time to review carefully, if the planned changes won't adversely impact auto <br />traffic concestion, I support them! <br />The city let's developers build out too close to the street <br />3 deferring to comments of those who have reviewed needs and given input to design <br />3 1 haven't seen the plan but often when they make these "improvements " they make it worse for <br />drivers. I'm against that. <br />3. Has bicycle and pedestrian safety been abnormally challenging in this aree ' <br />3 1 sup,aor-. gut think me^ey could be used for ^trier things t: -a- a -e me ' .,-art= <br />3 seems or tome but if they do something whicn I don't care about have the - i not r k, ss. EI <br />Camino i,: San Carlos is awful with all the unnessasary construction <br />3. I'm all fo ped and cycling safety improvements, but everything I read seemed to it Icer _ _ <br />the changes would further restrict or complicate driving through that area--,. fhici. is alreE , xf <br />difficult especially at commute times. If the pians also include maintaining, L-. be'cte . im^i o., rg <br />the drivabiiity of that area, I would support this with a S. <br />© 2018 Voca Advocacy Inc. Redwood City. California <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.