My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-03-11 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-03-11 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:00:49 AM
Creation date
3/7/2019 5:55:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/11/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLK-Pamela Aguilar <br />•om: Liane Redford <liane.redford@comcast.net> <br />fent: Monday, March 11, 2019 2:09 AM <br />To: GRP -City Council <br />Subject: One district -Redwood Shores <br />Hello <br />I understand re-, or should I say, original districting is underway. I've read that districting is needed to allow better <br />representation that reflects the diversity of RWC than can be achieved through "at large" council members. Redwood <br />Shores should be a single district. This is needed to fulfill the purpose of the districting initiative. Redwood Shores <br />fulfills all the attributes of a "district." <br />I see many versions of the districting maps online. While refinements may still be needed for other areas of Redwood <br />City, It's obvious, by any measure, Redwood Shores should be its own district. <br />Combining Redwood Shores with another geographic area violates the tenets of: compactness, contiguity, preservation <br />of community interest, and avoids favoring an incumbent. <br />Liane Redford. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.