CC Min 2001-07-23 Reg - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

NO. 2195, AND ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH (first reading on 07/09/01); D. ORDINANCE 1130-314 ADDING SECTION 60.20A.6 TO ORDINANCE NO. 1130, THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING ORDINANCE, REZONING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 TWIN DOLPHIN DRIVE IN THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY FROM THE "TP" (TIDAL PLAIN) TO THE "CP" (COMMERCIAL PARK) ZONING DISTRICTS (first reading on 07/09/01); 7. MATTERS OF COUNCIL INTEREST Council Member Howard stated anyone interested in participating in the Pride & Beautification awards can obtain information and an application by calling 780-7000. Council Member Pierce stated the Courthouse restoration project study would be available in early October, 2001. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING (SEE SEPARATE MINUTES) 9. STAFF REPORTS A. Appeal from Planning Commission Approval of Access Control Parking for Spieker Properties; (603) Planning & Redevelopment Manager Church explained that the project had been approved without parking gates or parking booths on April 4, 2000. On March 27, 2001, the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) approved the design and materials of the proposed gates and recommended to staff that the policy issue of access controlled parking should be reviewed by the Planning Commission. He stated that on June 5, 2001, the Planning Commission approved the parking access plan and on June 7, a Redwood Shores resident appealed the decision to the City Council. He continued to explain issues of the proposal and appeal. Comment by Appellant and Applicant: Peter Joshua, appellant, stated that he launched the appeal due to a precedent setting concern. He further stated that Spieker Properties justification is that installing gates would force use of public transportation. He further stated that revenue generation is the reason for installing the gates. Recess: 8:25 - 8:39 p.n~ REGULAR COUNCIL MEETiNG ..... ~ ........... ~ :~' JULY 23,2001 __ MINUTES PAGE 5 M1NUTES Book No. 58 Page No. 469