My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-08-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-08-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2006 9:01:13 AM
Creation date
8/3/2006 1:10:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
8/7/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 7B <br /> BRUCE LIEDSTRAND Page 11 <br /> COMMUNITY DESIGN DIRECTOR <br /> As Downtown Redwood City grows, regional transit connectivity will become <br /> even more important. If there is a disruption in the price or supply of gasoline, <br /> as some predict within the next few years, regional transit connectivity will be an <br /> important key to allowing people to get to work and back. <br /> Some connectivity suggestions: <br /> 1. Although the elements of the regional system are operated by separate <br /> transportation agencies, (Caltrain, BART, SF Muni, etc.), this should not be <br /> apparent to the transit user. The regional system should look to the user <br /> like a single system, with one ticket giving full access to the whole system. <br /> The transportation agencies need to improve their cooperation to achieve <br /> this. <br /> 2. The regional system should have a single schedule that coordinates all the <br /> elements. Such schedules are usually based on the major transit lines <br /> (BART, Caltrain, for example) and the others adjust their schedules to link <br /> with the major lines. <br /> 3. At present, the separate transit agencies compete with each other for <br /> funding, rather than cooperating. <br /> 4. Interconnectivity between the Peninsula and East Bay needs to be <br /> improved. <br /> Funding Transit through #Value Capture" <br /> Transit, though important, is expensive to build and to operate. In the United <br /> States, fare box revenues don't come close to paying the full cost of construction <br /> and operation of the transit system. Public funding usually makes up the <br /> difference. <br /> In Japan, however, a portion of the system cost is funded by "value capture", <br /> capturing "the appreciation in land values that accrues from increasing the <br /> accessibility of properties near rail stations./6 Despite the differences with the <br /> political and legal systems in Japan, "value capture" may be a tool worth <br /> pursuing to assist in funding improvements to transit systems here in the Bay <br /> Area. <br /> 6 The Transit Metropolis, A Global Inquiry, by Robert Cervero (1998), page 194. <br /> -8- <br /> 0 ,- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.