AgdaPkt 2006-09-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

September 25, 2006 - ATTACHMENT 1 7A Page 26 SBWMA Contractor Selection Process Executive Summar -," ~ .'" II ""'" Summ8lY of PAF and PAC Recommendations Table 1 Average Estimated Collection Rate Impact (Planning-Level Estimate of Programmatic Changes that are Individually Material) Estimated Collection t Optional for Rate Impact Member Agencies Residential;) . Curbside, sem;- and fully-automated collection (1.47%) - 0.87%.4 Optional with carts . Weekly recycling and yard waste collection 1.64% - 3.28% . Single-stream recyclables collection, wheeled 1.08% -2.15% carts, and processing I . Drop-off community clean-up events/recycling 0% - 0.24% Optional events (estimate assumes up to one per member agency) . Drop-off e-waste events (estimate assumes up 0% -0.12% I Optional to one per member agency) I Total 1.25% - 6.66% Multi-Family and Commercial . Universal roll-out of "free" recycling 1.17% -1.82% Optional . Single-stream recyclables collection and 0.21% processing . On-call collection of e-waste, u-waste, and 0.1% - 0.2% Optional; cost bulky items for a fee deoendent on fee I ch~rged customer . Periodic a-waste drop-off events (estimate 0% - 0.12% Option a! assumes up to one event per member agency) . On-site technical assistance and "recycling 0.18%-0.27% Optional buddies" for multi-family customers . On-site technical assistance for commercial 0% Optional customers I Subtotal 1.66% - 2.62% I Other Collection Services . Public education 0%-0.15% Subtotal 0%-0.15% I I i 3 Residential programs do not include food waste collection which may be implemented after additional study and assessment of processing capacity availability and costs. A 0.9% rate increase is estimated for residential food waste collection. 4 If there is limited participation is curbside collection, potential savings, may be limited reduced. Hifton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC ES-15