Laserfiche WebLink
Wagstaff and Associates Proposal for Services <br /> City of Redwood City Peninsula Park Project EIR Addendum Project <br /> September 28,2006 Page 1-1 <br /> 1. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND CEQA APPROACH <br /> 1.1 BACKGROUND <br /> In June 2003, the City of Redwood City certified the Final Environmental Impact Report for the <br /> Marina Shores Village Project ("2003 EIR"). The 2003 EIR consisted of two volumes: (1) a <br /> February 2003 Draft EIR, and (2) a June 2003 Final EIR. The 2003 EIR addressed the <br /> environmental implications of a proposed project on an approximately 46.45-acre site comprised <br /> of two non-contiguous properties located in the Bair Island Road area of the City--the <br /> approximately 33.24-acre Peninsula Marina property and the approximately 13.21-acre Pete's <br /> Harbor property. The proposed development program addressed in the 2003 EIR ("2003 EIR <br /> project") consisted of a mix of approximately 1,930 housing units, 300,000 square feet of office <br /> space and 12,000 square feet of retail space, in an array of buildings, including thirteen 18-to <br /> 23-story residential towers (maximum height: 260 feet), numerous 2- to 9-story low-rise <br /> residential flats, townhouse, and commercial (retail and office) buildings, and approximately <br /> 5.46-acres of marina (80 to 120 slips). <br /> The portion of the 2003 EIR project located within the 33.24-acre Peninsula Marina property <br /> consisted of approximately 1,297 housing units (67 percent of the project total) and 312,000 <br /> square feet of commercial floor area (100 percent of the project total) in an array of eight 18- to <br /> 21-story residential towers, numerous low-rise residential flats and townhouses, and all of the <br /> low-rise commercial (retail and office) buildings, plus approximately 3.80 acres of Marina (50 to <br /> 60 slips; approximately 60 percent of the project total). <br /> As required by CEQA, the 2003 EIR included a description and comparative evaluation of a <br /> range of nine alternatives to the proposed project. One of the alternatives, Alternative 6, was <br /> formulated by the applicant in consultation with City decision-makers to reduce EIR-identified <br /> visual, traffic and biological impacts and improve project waterfront relationships. Alternative 6 <br /> included a reduction in maximum tower height to 21 stories (236 feet), a larger 25,000-square- <br /> foot retail component (to "internalize" more vehicular trips), a 200-room hotel, and transit and <br /> transportation demand management (TDM) provisions to reduce peak period vehicular trips. <br /> Because Alternative 6 was assumed to more closely represent the actual, revised intentions of <br /> the applicant, its design characteristics and comparative impacts and mitigating effects were <br /> described in greater detail in the Alternatives chapter of the 2003 EIR "in order to provide <br /> adequate CEQA documentation (i.e., minimize the need for supplemental CEQA <br /> documentation) should the City elect to approve this or a similar alternative." <br /> In June 2004, the City approved a General Plan amendment and Precise Plan rezoning (2004 <br /> PDP) permitting a variation of the 2003 EIR project similar to Alternative 6, including 1,930 <br /> housing units, 50,000 square feet of local-serving retail, 150,000 square feet of office space, <br /> and a 200-room hotel, with a maximum tower height of 20 stories (240 feet). Subsequently, a <br /> local voter referendum, Measure "Q," was passed that repealed the City's 2004 Precise Plan <br /> rezoning approvals. The referendum cited a range of environmental and other concerns about <br /> the 2004 project, including issues of building height, density, traffic, Bay fill, and public access to <br /> the waterfront. Passage of the referendum resulted in a return of the two project properties to <br /> C:IDocuments and SettingslkmateolLocal SettingslTemporary Internet Filesl0602 proposal section 1-rev.doc <br />