Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CWM:djm /28/90 RD-7/27) <br /> <br />evaluated during construction. The conclusion of <br /> <br />the several experts engaged to make the <br /> <br />evaluations of toxins for the EIR, which <br /> <br /> <br />conclusion has not been challenged, is that an <br /> <br />appropriate combination of the remedial measures <br /> <br />set forth in the Final EIR would adequately <br /> <br /> <br />address all known toxin problems found on the <br /> <br />site. The most cost effective and functional <br /> <br />remedial actions for the indicated soil and ground <br /> <br /> <br />water contamination should be selected, subject to <br /> <br /> <br />the approval of the Executive Director, and the <br /> <br /> <br />remediation program should be coordinated with <br /> <br /> <br />construction activities. <br /> <br />d. Mitigation Monitoring Responsibility. <br /> <br />Responsibili ty for monitoring the mitigation <br /> <br /> <br />measures ultimately employed is assigned to the <br /> <br />Developer; and the Developer shall report to the <br /> <br />County Environmental Health Department and other <br /> <br /> <br />responsible agencies, regarding volatile organic <br /> <br />concentrations in the ground water. Such <br /> <br />reporting will end when hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> <br /> <br />are consistently below regulatory standards. Bay <br /> <br />Area Air Quality Management District requirements <br /> <br />shall be observed. <br /> <br />10. HETLANDS (Biotic Resources). <br /> <br />a. Significant Effects. The Project would result in <br /> <br /> <br />loss of 0.5 acres of stream channel habitat and a <br /> <br />limited amount of riparian vegetation. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />112R5 <br />