Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CWr1:djm <br /> <br />/28/90 RD-7/27) <br /> <br />this proj ect. The possible effects on the <br /> <br />environment of a setback infringement can be <br /> <br />mitigated by additional landscaping, more than <br /> <br /> <br />five (5) foot setbacks in places and other high <br /> <br /> <br />quality improvements to the Project. <br /> <br /> <br />c. Rationale and Facts Supporting Findings. The <br /> <br /> <br />requirements of a Planned Development are more <br /> <br />stringent and produce a higher quality proj ect <br /> <br />than zoning ordinance requirements alone would <br /> <br />produce. For this reason the Agency and the <br /> <br />Council are willing to grant the necessary <br /> <br /> <br />planning flexibility to maximize the usage of the <br /> <br /> <br />Project Site. <br /> <br />d. Mitigation Monitoring Responsibility. <br /> <br /> <br />Responsibility for monitoring these mitigation <br /> <br />measures shall be with the Redevelopment Agency <br /> <br />and the Planning Director. <br /> <br />2. LAND USE SUCCESSION. <br /> <br /> <br />a. Significant Effects. The Sequoia Station Project <br /> <br />could result in "land use succession", which is <br /> <br /> <br />the tendency for small and economically marginal <br /> <br />land uses to be replaced with larger, more <br /> <br /> <br />intensive uses in response to strong economic <br /> <br />trends. <br /> <br />This could result in conversion or <br /> <br />redevelopment of non-conforming housing units and <br /> <br /> <br />small scale commercial buildings in transition <br /> <br />areas with larger conforming commercial buildings. <br /> <br /> <br />b. Findings. This land use succession impact cannot <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />11265 <br />