Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.REPORT <br /> <br />7A <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />To, the Honorable Mayor and City Oouncil <br />From the Clty Manager <br /> <br />December 4,2006 <br /> <br />Subject <br />Community Tree Task Force Recommendations to City Council <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />1) Receive the Community Tree Task Force's report and recommendations with respect <br />to the City's codes, policies, and practices regarding the regulation of trees on public <br />and private property; <br />2) Provide opportunity for clarifying questions of Task Force members and public <br />comment; <br />3) By motion, accept recommendations in concept, confirm prioritization of the proposed <br />recommendations based on staff input, and direct staff to return to Council with <br />implementation recommendations and actions for Council consideration. <br /> <br />Background <br />In 1998, a special Task Force of the City Council was formed to consider the policies and <br />implementation of the Sidewalk Repair and Tree Program. At that time, there had been <br />concern about the removal of some large street trees as a result of needed sidewalk repair. <br />The 1998 Task Force made policy determinations specifically related to retention and <br />replacement of street trees with respect to potential sidewalk maintenance conflicts. In <br />addition to City codes and policies related to trees located within the public right-of-way, <br />the City also has a Tree Preservation Ordinance. The Tree Preservation Ordinance <br />regulates trees located on private property. City staff has been implementing both the <br />policies established by the 1998 Task Force, as well as the Tree Preservation Ordinance. <br /> <br />Community Tree Task Force Creation: <br />Over the past eight years of implementation, new concerns have evolved with respect to <br />both public and private property tree policies and requirements. For example, one 1998 <br />policy directed that large-scale street trees be planted throughout the City regardless of <br />the size of the existing planting area. One approach to planting large trees in substandard <br />sites has resulted in moving sidewalks next to the curb. This eliminates the landscape <br />planting strips between the curb and sidewalk on some streets so that trees can be planted <br />in larger areas on the front yard side of the sidewalk. The unintended consequence of this <br />policy has resulted in some significant changes to the streetscape on those blocks. <br /> <br />In other cases, property owners have tried to obtain permits to remove "nuisance" trees <br />from their own yards. Because the Tree Preservation Ordinance requires that trees of <br />protected size (12-inches in diameter or greater) be dead, dying or structurally unsound to <br />qualify for removal, property owners have complained that the ordinance is too strict. The <br />result has been that staff must respond to a wide variety of needs within the framework <br />provided via the various codes, policies and professional tree care practices. In addition to <br />concerns from citizens throughout the City, Public Works Services and Community <br /> <br />Page 1 of4 <br />