Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7A <br />Development Services staff have desired further study and adjustment to the existing Page 2 <br />construct under which we have been working in order to provide alternate solutions. <br /> <br />In late 2005, the Mayor determined that it was time to establish a new Community Tree <br />Task Force to revisit a broad range of issues. The Task Force was created in a similar <br />fashion to the Recycled Water Task Force. Invitations were broadly circulated and over 100 <br />community members applied. The selection criteria sought diversity in terms of viewpoint, <br />geographic location within the City, as well as varying levels of knowledge about trees. The <br />final selection of 25 members and 5 alternate members was made by the Mayor and <br />Council Member Bain and approved by the Council as a whole in early 2006. <br /> <br />Tree Task Force Meetings: <br />Twelve meetings were noticed and scheduled for the second and fourth Wednesday of <br />each month from March through August. The first meeting was held at City Hall, and the <br />rest of these meetings were held at the Main Library. In August, the Task Force determined <br />that they needed an additional meeting to complete their work assignment. This final <br />(thirteenth) meeting was noticed separately and held on September 13, 2006 in the <br />Community Activities Building. <br /> <br />All of the Tree Task Force meetings were facilitated by Dr. Cecil Reeves and were also <br />supported by City Staff. Group agreements with respect to absences, quorum, and <br />consensus were established at the first meeting. Thresholds for attendance and decision- <br />making were set at high levels. Tree Task Force Members could miss no more than two <br />meetings. A quorum was determined to be 80% ofthe active membership. Consensus was <br />determined to be 80% of the members present, assuming that a quorum was present. <br /> <br />The Tree Task Force meetings were interactive and a wide variety of information was <br />provided to the members in different formats. City Staff supplied the background on <br />existing policies and practices and also created a field trip itinerary to help highlight the <br />range of challenges associated with the subject at hand. In the early half of the sessions, <br />four expert guest speakers made presentations: <br />. John Melvin (Regional Field Specialist from the California Department of Forestry); <br />. Nelda Methany (Bay Area based consulting arborist with extensive experience in <br />municipal tree regulations and served as consultant to the 1998 task force); <br />. Rob Kerth (Marketing Manager Sacramento Tree Foundation presenting <br />Sacramento's ambitious 28-jurisdiction "Greenprint" canopy enhancement program); <br />. Jack Stephens (founding member of City Trees, Redwood City's own community- <br />based tree-planting and education group). <br /> <br />"Homework" was also regularly assigned by the facilitator to keep the meetings productive. <br /> <br />An eight-member subset of the Tree Task Force was established at the sixth meeting on <br />May 24th. This 'Working Committee" met on the alternative Wednesdays ofthe Tree Task <br />Force schedule, and additional times as well near the end of the process. The Working <br />Committee discussed and prepared draft documents for consideration by the larger group. <br />The Working Committee's meetings were not noticed and were generally conducted at the <br />Community Activities Building. The Working Committee did not have permission to make <br />decisions for the larger Task Force <br /> <br />Staff would like to acknowledge to the City Council the significant effort devoted by all Tree <br />Task Force members and especially those serving on the Working Committee. The <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />