My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-01-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-01-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2007 11:08:52 AM
Creation date
1/18/2007 11:30:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE BUDGET from page 1 . . . . . .. . . ... . .. .. . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... pag~~ <br /> <br />Also included in the 2007-08 budget is the <br />second installment of the Governor's "Strategic <br />Growth Plan." The first instaliment was introduced <br />in January 2006 and resulted in the passage of the <br />2006 infrastructure bond package. In the current <br />budget, Schwarzenegger proposed another round <br />of both general obligation and lease-revenue <br />bonds totaling $43.3 billion. <br /> <br />This funding would be used for items he <br />mentioned in his State of the State address on <br />January 9, which included the expansion of pris- <br />ons, more funding for construction and renovation <br />of classrooms, increasing water storage and other <br />additional funding for unmet infrastructure needs. <br />For more on the Governor's State of the State <br />address, see "Schwarzenegger Reveals Ambi- <br />tious Plans during State of the State Address" <br />on Page 1. ' <br /> <br />. The Governor's proposed budget is a starting <br />pOint for discussions with the Legislature. (A copy <br />of the Governor's Budget may be viewed at <br />www.ebudaet.ca.aov.) In May, the Governor will <br />~resent a revised budget after numerous legisla- <br />tIve hearings, deliberations and negotiations before <br />a final compromise is reached over the summer. <br /> <br />. The budget proposal continues to support key <br />cIty programs in the following areas: <br /> <br />Tra ns DO rtation: <br /> <br />Proposition 1 B: Proposition 1 B will provide <br />approximately $7.1 billion directly to local govern- <br />ments over the next few years. For 2007-08, the <br />Governor proposes the fOllowing allocations of <br />importance to cities: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />$600 million for local streets and roads <br />split evenly between cities and countie~ in <br />FY 2007-08, $300 million split evenly for FY <br />2008-09, and $150 million split each year <br />beyond that (until the $2 billion total is <br />reached) <br />$600 million for local transit <br />$170 million for state and local <br />partnerships <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />$340 million for State Transportation <br />Improvement Projects (STIP) <br />$55 million for grade separations <br />$9 million for seismic bridge retrofitting <br /> <br />Proposition 42 Loan Repayment: The <br />Governor's budget proposes to fully fund Proposi- <br />tion 42: <br />$684 million to the Transportation <br />Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) <br />· $699 million to STIP <br />$175 million to Public Transportation <br />Account (PTA) <br /> <br />Pursuant to a formula in current law and under <br />a longstanding agreement that provided cities and <br />counties with local streets and roads funds in <br />2001-02 and 2002-03, cities and counties will not <br />receive any local streets and roads maintenance <br />funds from Proposition 42 in 2007-08. However, <br />per the existing formula, cities and counties will <br />receive approximately double their prior alloca- <br />tions beginning in 2008-09. <br /> <br />Public Transportation Account: The budget <br />proposes to divert $1.1 billion of "spillover" rev- <br />enues from the transit programs in the Public <br />Transportation Account (PTA) to help close the <br />General Fund (GF) budget gap. A similar proposal <br />last year was controversial for transit agencies. <br />PTA spillover revenues occur when growth in <br />revenues from the sales tax on gasoline exceed <br />the growth sales tax revenues from other taxable <br />goods. (Understanding the PTA account can be <br />difficult. For an explanation please see <br />www.californiacityfinance.com/ <br />SpilloverFAQ060612.odf) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />$627 million redirected to fund the GF for <br />home-to-school transportation <br />$144 million for regional center <br />transportation services <br />$340 million for repayment of general <br />obligation bond debt <br /> <br />Continued on Page 4 <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Website--www.cacities.org <br /> <br />PRIORITY FOCUS. PAGE 3 <br />January 12, 2007 - Issue #2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.