Laserfiche WebLink
Appeal against the Issuance of Architectural Permit, Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />I have discussed my concerns with the Vivianis. I have suggested that they <br />expand their home on the first floor only, or that if they do add a second story, <br />that they do it within the footprint of the current structure. While they were <br />very gracious, we were unable to come to a resolution. <br /> <br />I also want to state that I am very disappointed in the planning process that is <br />administered by the City of Redwood City. I understand my neighbor's desire <br />to increase the size of their home, but I am very aware that it will have a great <br />impact on my own property both during and after construction. In talking to <br />the city planners, I did not find that they were very interested in protecting my <br />interests in this dispute. I pay the same taxes as do my neighbors, and feel that I <br />am entitled to the resources of the City in resolving this dispute and protecting <br />my stake in the community. Yet the zoning does not explicitly codify the rights <br />and interests of those who own properties affected by new construction. <br /> <br />! know that it is possible to expand a home in an architecturally agreeable <br />manner. A good example of a second story addition that really enhances both <br />the home and the neighborhood is the second-story addition on the east corner <br />of James and Duane. I have been very impressed with how they expanded the <br />home in an aesthetically appealing, pleasantly scaled way. Across the street from <br />that home is a one-story expansion that is equally pleasing. <br /> <br />The charming, established neighborhoods in Redwood City are an important <br />component of its attractiveness as a 'community. I have no doubt that the <br />property tax revenue that these neighborhoods generate is important to the City <br />also. <br /> <br />I th.ink that the City is obligated to play a more discerning role in mitigating the <br />pressures for expansion in established neighborhoods. I would like to see that <br />my rights to maintaining the ambiance of the neighborhood that I invested in <br />are placed equal to those of my neighbors to alter or expand their properties. I <br />would like to see the City play a more proactive role in helping neighbors build <br />structures that enhance their neighborhoods. I would like City architects and <br />plarmers involved in helping neighbors to resolve disputes in a manner that <br />leaves all parties feeling satisfied, not compromised. <br /> <br />Respectfully, <br /> <br />Sue Marek <br /> <br />cc: Michael and Alicia Viviani <br /> <br /> <br />