My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-02-05
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-02-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2007 11:55:44 AM
Creation date
2/1/2007 2:09:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
2/5/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Attachment 1 <br /> <br />98 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Overview of Redwood City's Proposed <br />Park Standard and Development In-Lieu Fee Ordinance <br /> <br />Why establish a park standard for the City? <br />The Park and Recreation Commission recommended that Redwood City establish a <br />standard to set the community expectation for parks and attempt to at least maintain our <br />current ratio of active community parkland to residents as future development occurs. <br />Redwood City is one of very few cities on the Peninsula where such a standard and fee is <br />not in place. The creation of a standard would provide clear direction to staff as to the <br />community's desire for parks as expressed by this Council policy. The Commission felt <br />that the recommendation was also responsive to the Council priority to increase the <br />number and quality of playing fields in the community. Consideration of a park standard <br />and in.lieu fee is particularly timely as Redwood City contemplates substantial amounts of <br />new residential development. <br /> <br />What is the Recommended Standard? <br />A 3 acres/1000 residents standard is recommended based on the existing level of <br />"active community parkland". Our definition of active community parkland has three <br />components: land that is within the City limits of Redwood City; owned by a public <br />agency; and land with active recreational value. By selecting active community parkland <br />acreage the Commission made a conscience choice about the type of space they felt <br />was most needed in the City. Their choices for what is included in the inventory of active <br />community parkland reflect a belief that we need a variety of spaces hence school fields <br />are included as were places that are pedestrian friendly and promote community <br />building, and more traditional parks. We realized that particularly school fields, which we <br />coordinate organized use of, made up a large piece of what is available for active <br />recreation. You will note that we also included areas that have very little turf such as <br />Courthouse Square and the City Hall Plaza that meet the pedestrian friendly, community <br />building character of active community space. Areas such as Edgewood Park and Don <br />Edwards Preserve are not included because the vast majority of the land is held to <br />preserve open space rather than provide active recreational value. <br /> <br />What are the Consequences of the Current Park to Resident Ratio Eroding? <br />There are several ways to look at the consequences of not establishing and maintaining <br />our current standard. First, using the active parkland definition, Redwood City currently <br />has 2.99 acres/1000 residents (225.5 acresl75,402 residents x1000). Growth estimates, <br />through the year 2020, suggest the creation of 4,329 new residential units or new <br />additions which are expected to add 7,845 new residents. That means that to simply <br />stay at the same relative level we are at today we would need to add 23.5 acres of new <br />parkland. Hoover, Marlin, Stafford and Maddux Parks total 23.5 acres. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.