Laserfiche WebLink
important. Questions about the reduction in number of units were asked. The need <br />for sensitivity and options around the historical districts and a description about the <br />changes in the Downtown Precise Plan from various uses what the changes mean <br />and the reasons for doing it. <br />Recommendation: <br />Review for informational purposes — no action or decisions required at this <br />time. <br />9. MATTERS OF COUNCIL INTEREST - <br />A. Legislation (information only) - This sub - section involves possible discussion of <br />City Position on Proposed Legislation described in the League of California Cities <br />Priority Focus Bulletin No. 3 -2007 and 4 -2007. Council may direct staff to act on <br />positions taken by Council. (Copies of League of California Cities Priority Focus <br />available in City Clerk's Department). <br />B. Update on Consideration of Park Standard and Development Fee - City Council <br />Finance Committee <br />Council Member Ira, Finance Committee Chair gave the background regarding <br />consideration of a park dedication or in -lieu fee ordinance. <br />Recommendation: <br />Information Only <br />10. ADJOURNMENT —8:45 p.m. <br />M/S Ira /Foust to adjourn until the next City Council meeting of February 12, 2007. The <br />motion passed by a unanimous voice vote by those present. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Patricia S. Howe <br />City Clerk <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FEBRUARY 5, 2007 <br />MEETING MINUTES PAGE 5 <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 61 <br />Page No. 327 <br />