My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2007 4:38:38 PM
Creation date
3/8/2007 2:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/12/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />IDENTII=IED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEAt:iURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Enti Verfflcation Enti Re irements <br /> environment. This choice would result in a <br /> sfgnfficant unavofdabfe impact under <br /> current CEQA and City criteria for <br /> "Intersection Im acts." <br />Impact 9-8: Impact on BroadwaylJefferson Mitigation 9-8. Add an exclusive City; fair-share City If and when improvements <br />Avenue intersection--Moderate Intensity northbound left-turn lane on Broadway, and reimbursement adopted, City shall conduct <br />Precise Plan Alternative. During the PM convert the existing northbound shared left- from future annual traffic monitoring„at <br />peak hour, Moderate Intensity project traffic through right lane into a shared <br />l <br />Th <br />h individual <br />roject this intersection and <br />implement fair-share <br />would reduce the level of service to LOS F <br />and increase average delay by more than five anges <br />ane. <br />ese c <br />throughlright-tum <br />would result in an acceptable LOS D under p <br />applicants. requirement when level of <br />(5) seconds at the Broadway/Jefferson <br />Avenue intersection. This change would the Moderate Intensity alternative. <br />Implementation of this measure would service reaches LOS E <br />(average delay of greater than <br />represent a significant fmpacf. therefore reduce the impact to a less-than- 55 seconds). <br /> significant level. <br /> or <br /> Because this mitigation would result in the <br /> loss of sidewalk at corner bulb-outs, <br /> degrading the existing and futuree <br /> pedestrian environment and sidewalk <br /> dining opportunities, and would t>e <br /> inconsistent with the existing anti proposed <br /> City policies giving priority to the Downtown <br /> pedestrian environment, the Ci#y may <br /> choose to avoid this intersection <br /> modification in the interest of protecting the <br /> pedestrian environment. This choice would <br /> result in a significant unavoidable impact <br /> under current CEQA and City cxiteria for <br /> "Intersection Im acts." <br />Impact 9-9: Impact on Broadway/ <br />d <br />t Mitigation 9-9. The intersection of <br />Broadway/Middlefield Road is currently a 4- City; fair-share <br />reimbursement Ciiy If and when improvements <br />adopted, City shall conduct <br />era <br />e <br />Middfeffeld Road Intersection--Mo <br />Intensity Precise Plan Alternative. During way stop controlled intersection. from future annual traffc monitoring at <br />this intersection and <br />the PM peak hour, the Moderate Intensity Signalizing the intersection (2-phase <br />control) would result in LOS B operations individual <br />project implement fair-share <br />project traffic increment would reduce <br />operation to LOS E and increase average under Moderate Intensity conditions, applicants. requirement when level of <br />service reaches LOS E <br />delay by more than five (5) seconds at the thereby reducing this impact to a less-tha»- (average delay of greater than <br />Broadway/Middlefield Road intersection. This significant level. 55 seconds). <br />change would represent a sig»ificant or <br />impact Because this signalizatlon mitigation would: <br /> (a) be less supportive of pedestrian <br /> convenience and orientation than the <br /> existing 4-way stop due to delays to <br /> pedestrians waiting to cross during "walk" <br /> phases and higher vehicle speeds through <br /> the intersection; (b) be inconsistent with <br /> City intentions for this intersection to be <br /> pedestrian-oriented given its location in the <br /> Downtown core; and c be inoonsistent <br />l1 <br />~~ <br />Page 12 UaMy DocumertslDowntown Precise PIanICG staff repo; ts1CC 3. t2,doc13.12.07 Exhi6itslAttachmenl A mit.monifcrirg checklist 655.d~ D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.