My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2007 4:38:38 PM
Creation date
3/8/2007 2:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/12/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MONITORING VERIFiCATtON <br />IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE tmptementation Monitoring and liming Signature Date <br /> Entit Verification Enti Re ulrements <br />This effect would represent a slgnifrcant allow changing from a current split-phase CMP <br />Impact. operation (eastbound/westbound) to a intersection, <br /> protected left turn phasing, and would and individual <br /> improve operation to LOS D in the AM peak projects may <br /> hour and to LOS E in the PM peak hour. require <br /> However, Implementation of this Transportation <br /> improvement is not deemed feasible by the Demand <br /> City due to the need to acquire right-of-way Management ,, <br /> from adjacent commercial fronfage. (TDM) plans per <br /> Therefore, this impact is consideread to be CICAG adopted <br /> sf nfficant artd unavoidable. uidelines. <br />Impact 9-13: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-13. Mitigating this impact City; fair-share City; CICAG If and when improvements <br />Cumulative Impacts at the EI Camino Reai! would require adding a second northbound reimbursement <br />f <br />tu <br />f adopted. City shall conduct <br />annual traffic monitoring at <br />Jefferson Avenue Intersection. During the <br />the addition of project traffic <br />PM peak hour left-turn lane on EI Camino Real, ;and <br />converting the right-turn lane into a shared rom <br />u <br />re <br />individual this intersection and <br />, <br />would increase average delay by five (5} throughlright-turn lane. This improvement <br />would necessitate lane restriping and project <br />applicants. implement fair-share <br />requirement when level of <br />seconds or more at this intersection, which <br />wou{d already be operating at LOS E. This possible median modifications. Level of service reaches LO5 E <br />effect would represent a significant impact. service with this improvement would remain (average delay of greater Phan <br />Individual <br />55 seconds) <br /> LOS E during the PM peak hour, but the . <br /> increase in delay resulting from project projects may require <br /> traffic would be less than 5 seconiis. Any Transportation Demand <br /> improvement to EI Camino Real would Management (TDM) plans per <br /> require Caltrans approval. At this time, CICAG adopted guidelines. <br /> lacking Caltrans approval, implementation <br /> of this mitigation is not assured. Therefore, <br /> this impac# is considered to be sihnificanf <br /> and unavoidable. <br />Impact 9-14: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-14. The addition of a second City; fair-share City; CICAG If and when improvements <br />Cumulative Impacts at the Middlefie{d eastbound left-turn lane on Woodside Road reimbursement <br />r <br />f <br />t <br />f adopted, City shall conduct <br />annual traffic monitoring at <br />RoadNVoodside Road intersection. During <br />the project traffic <br />the AM and PM peak hour (SR 84}would reduce the overall <br />intersection delay without the project during rom <br />u <br />u <br />e <br />individual this intersection and <br />, <br />would increase average delay by five (5) the PM peak hour, but khe delay v~ithout the <br />A project <br />licants <br />a implement fair-share <br />requirement when level of <br />seconds or more at the intersection of M <br />project would remain signifipnt in the . <br />pp service reaches L05 E <br />Middlefield Road/Woodside Road,. which peak hour. With the addition of the second (average delay of greater than <br />would already be operating at LOS E/F. This eastbound left-turn lane, the intersection 55 seconds). Individual <br />effect would represent a slgnificanf Impact. would still operate at LOS F in both the AM projects may require <br /> and PM peak hours with the project. In Transportation Demand <br /> addition, any improvement to Wa~dside Management (TDM) plans per <br /> Road (SR 84) would require Caltrans CICAG adopted guidelines. <br /> approval. Caltrans approval for this <br /> mitigation is not assured. For these <br /> reasons, this impact is considereti to be <br /> si nifrcantand unavoidable. <br />Impact 9-15: Project Contribution to <br />fi <br />ld <br />dl Mitigation 9-15(a). Restripe the <br />southbound approach of Middlefield Road City; fair-share <br />reimbursement City If and when improvements <br />adopted, City shall conduct <br />e <br />e <br />Cumulative Impacta at the Mid <br />Road/Jefferson Avenue intersection. to one through lane and one right-turn lane, from future annual traffic monitoring at <br /> <br />~~ <br />Page 14 UaMy DocumentstDovmtown Precise PIan;CC staff reportslCC 3.12. doc13-12.07 ExhfbitslAttachmenf Amid. monitoring checklis# 655.doc~ D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.