AgdaPkt 2007-03-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED M{TIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature bate Enti Verification Entl R uirements may choose to avoid this intersection modification in the interest of protecting the pedestrian environment. This choice would result in a significant unavoidable impact based on current CEQA and City criteria for "intersection Im acts:' Impact 9-18: Project Contribution to Mit[gation 9-18. This impact would be City; fair-share i b t City; ClCAG If and when improvements City shall conduct ado ted Cumulative Impacts at the Bay Road! Woodside Road Intersection. During the mitigated by implementing the Woodside Road Widening project, which requires m ursemen re from future p , annual traffic monitoring at PM peak hour, project-generated traffic would Caltrans approval. That project is not fatly nor has a design been approved by funded individual project this intersection and implement fair-share increase average delay by flue (5) seconds or which already would more at this intersection , Caltrans. Therefore, implementation of this applicants. requirement when level of , be operating at LOS F. This effect would mitigation is not assured, and this impact is considered significant and unavoidable. service reaches LOS E {average delay of greater than represent a significant impact 55 seconds). Individual projects may require Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plans per ClCAG ado ted uidelines. impact 9-19: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-19(a}. Add an eastbound left- Mitigation N!A NIA Cumulative Impacts at the Veterans BoulevardlWhipple Avenue Intersection. In turn lane on Whipple Avenue. This modification would mitigate impacts in the considered not feasible by City the AM peak hour, project traffic would PM peak hour, but not in the AM peak hour. reduce operation from LOS D to LOS F at this In addition, this mitigation would require intersection. In the PM peak hour, project acquisition of right-of-way from commercial ' traffic would increase average delay by five is frontage (including a gas station) and (5) seconds or more at this in#ersection, which therefore not considered feasible by the would already be operating at LOS F. These City. This impact therefore would be effects would represent a significant impact, significant and unavoidable. or or or or Mitigation 9-19(b}. As a feasible option, City; fair-share City If and when improvements add a second westbound left-turn lane on reimbursement adopted, City shad conduct Whipple Avenue. This modification would from future annual traffic monitoring at reduce the level of impact, but not to a less- individual this intersection and than-significant level (i.e., would not project implement fair-share mitigate either the AM or the Ptu1 peak hour applicants, requirement when Ieve1 of impact). Therefore, although reduced, this service reaches LOE E impact would remain significant and (average delay of greater than unavoidable. 55 seconds . Impact 9-20: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-20(a}. Restripe eastbound Brewster Avenue to one left-turn lane and City; fair-share reimbursement City It ana wnen +mprovemenus adopted, City shall conduct Gumulatfve Impacts at the Veterans BoulevardlBrewster Avenue Intersection. one shared left-through-right tam lane. from future annual traffic monitoring at tersection and i thi During the PM peak hour, project-generated Signal operations would need to be changed to allow for split phasing for the individual project s n implement fair-share traffic would reduce operation to LOS F and increase delay by five (5} seconds or more at eastbound/westbound Brewster applicants. requirement when level of ~~ Pogo ~ ~ U:'Jt'fy DocumentslDov~nfow~n Precise Plan4CC sfaff repcrtslCC 3. i2.dcet3. f2.07 Exhibrts',~itachment A mit. monitoring checklist 655.d Et~ D