My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2007
>
AgdaPkt 2007-03-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2007 4:38:38 PM
Creation date
3/8/2007 2:32:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/12/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Ent' Veriflwtion Enti Re uirements <br />Impact 9.16: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-1 B. Adding an exclusive City, fair-share City If and when improvements <br />Cumulative Impacts at the Broadwayl northbound left-turn lane on Broadway and reimbursement adopted, City shall conduct <br />Jefferson Avenue Intersection. During the converting the existing northbound-shared from future <br />i <br />di <br />id <br />l annual traffic monitoring at <br />this intersection and <br />PM peak hour, tl~e addition of project traffic <br />would increase average delay by mare than left-through right lane into a shared <br />through/right-turn lane would result in n <br />v <br />ua <br />project implement fair-share <br />five (5) seconds at this intersection, which improved LOS F operation with less applicants. requirement when level of <br />service reaches LOS E <br />would already be operating at LOS F. This average delay than that experienced under <br />i (average delay of greatEi than <br />effect would represent a significant impact. tions. <br />Cumulative (Without Project) Cond 55 seconds) <br /> Implementation of this mitigation would . <br /> therefore reduce the project impact to a <br /> Tess-than-significant level. <br /> or <br /> Because this mitigation would result in the <br /> loss of sidewalk at corner bulb-outs, <br /> degrading the existing and future <br /> pedestrian environment and sidewalk <br /> dining opportunities, and would be <br /> inconsistent with City policies giving priority <br /> to the Downtown pedestrian environment, <br /> the City may choose to avoid this <br /> intersection modification in the interest of <br /> protecting the pedestrian environment. <br /> This choice would result in a significant <br /> unavoidable impact based on arrrent <br /> CEQA and City criteria tar "Intersection <br /> Im acts " <br />Impact 9-17: Project Contribution to <br />l Mitigation 9-17. The intersection of <br />/Middlefield Road is currently a 4- <br />Broadwa City; fair-share <br />reimbursement City 1f and when improvements <br />adopted, City shall conduct <br />Cumulative Impacts at the Broadway <br />During the PM <br />Middlefield Intersection y <br />way stop controlled intersection. from future annual traffic monitoring at <br />. <br />peak hour, average delay would increase by <br />i Signalizing the intersection (2-phase <br />control) would result in LOS C operations individual <br />project this Intersection and <br />implement fair-share <br />on, <br />five (5) seconds or more at this intersect <br />which already would be operating at LOS F. under Cumulative (With Project) Conditions applicants. requirement when level of <br />LOS <br />This effect would represent a significant during the Ph1 peak hour. Implementation <br />of this measure would result in a less-than- E <br />service reaches <br />(average delay of greater than <br />impact. significant impact. 55 seconds). <br /> or <br /> Because this signalization mitigation would: <br /> (a} be less supportive of pedestrian <br /> convenience and orientation than the <br /> existing 4-way stop due to delays to <br /> pedestrians waiting to cross during °walk" <br /> phases and higher vehicle speeds through <br /> the intersection; (b) be inconsistent with <br /> City intentions for this intersection to be <br /> pedestrian-oriented given its location in the <br /> Downtown core; and (c) be inconsistent <br /> with City policies giving priority to the <br /> Downtown edestrian environment, the Ci <br />Page 16 U.•1Myflocumentstt7ownfown Precise PlanlCC staff reporfslCC 3.92,doci3. J2.07 Exhi(xtslAttachmeni A mit.monitoring checklist 655.doc~ D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.