Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VER[FICATION <br />IDENTIFIED IMPAGT RELATED MITIGATION MEA:iURE Implementation Monitoring and Tlming Signature Date <br /> Enti Verification Enti Re uirements <br /> - a parking cash-out program for <br /> employees (where non-driving <br /> employees receive <br /> transportation allowance <br /> equivalent to the value of <br /> subsidized parking}. <br /> Implementation of these measures would - ` <br /> assist in reducing Identified Precise Plan- <br /> related and cumulative impacts on long- <br /> term regional ROG, NOz, and PM,o <br /> emission levels by perhaps 5 to 10 percent <br /> beyond what the proposed Precise Plan <br /> itself may achieve through its "trip <br /> internalization" and alternative modes <br /> effects; however, since reductions of (in <br /> some cases) over 70 percent would be <br /> required to bring project-related regional <br /> emission increases to below BA/aQMD <br /> significance thresholds, the project and <br /> cumulative effects on ROG, NOx, and PM,o <br /> emission levels would represent a <br /> si nifcant unavoidable im act. <br /> <br />BlOLOGlCAL RESOURCES <br />Impact 14-1: Potential Loss of Heritage Mitigation 14-1. Prior to, or as a condition Individual <br />t City Condition of grading permit <br />issuance; field verify <br />Trees. Under either the Maximum or <br />Moderate Intensity Precise Plan alternative, of, finalization of plans for future individual <br />development projects in the Precise Plan projec <br />applicants implementation during grading <br />future development in accordance with the area, require that any proposed tree and construction. <br />Precise Plan may result in the removal of removal be subject to the appliG3tion and <br />' <br />heritage trees as defined by the City's Tree s Tree <br />review process specified in the (:ity <br />Preservation Ordinance (Municipal Code Preservation Ordinance (Municipal Code <br />chapter 35). This possibility represents a chapter 35). Implementation of this <br />potentially signltJcant impact. measure would ensure protection of <br /> heritage trees, thereby mitigatiny potential <br /> im acts to aless-than-si niticant level. <br />Impact 14-2: Potential Loss of Special- Mitigation 14-2. If disturbance of suitable Individual City During project-specific <br />environmental review <br />Status Spec'ses. Under either the Maximum habitat is proposed as part of future <br />i <br />th <br />t <br />l project <br />plicants <br />a <br />or Moderate Intensity Precise Plan e <br />s <br />n <br />opment projec <br />individual deve p <br />future Precise Plan-facilitated <br />alternative vicinity of Redwood Creek, require surveys <br />, <br />development in the vicinity of Redwood Creek prior to finalization of such projects in order <br />may result in the loss of spedal-status to determine definitively whether any <br />species, This possibility is considered to be a special-status species occur in tfie affected <br />potentially significant impact. area. Such surveys shall be conducted by <br /> a qualified botanist following applicable <br /> guidelines of the California Department of <br /> Fish and Game andlor U.S. Fish and <br /> Wildlife Service to rovide a conclusive <br />N <br />~~ <br />Page 32 U:1My DocumentslCowntown Precise PlantCC staff reporfslCC 3.12.doc13, f 1.07 Exhibitstrttfachment A mit.monitoring checklist 655.d~ D <br />