Laserfiche WebLink
MON1TORiNG VERIFICATION <br />IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implerr~ntation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Enti Verification Enti Re uirements <br /> determination on presence or absence. If <br /> any populations with legal protective status <br /> are encountered, an appropriate mitigation <br /> plan shall be developed in consultation <br /> with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, <br /> the jurisdictional agencies to provide for <br /> their protection (e.g., specific setbacks from <br /> the creek, activity restrictions). <br /> Implementation of this measure would <br /> ensure protection of possible populations of <br /> special-status spedes in the Precise Plan <br /> area, mitigating potential impacts to a less- <br /> fhan-si nifirant level. _ <br />Impact 14-3: Jurisdictional Wetland Mitigation 14-3. For any future individual Individual City; CDFG; Corps During project-specific <br />Impacts, Under either the Maximum or development projects in the vicinity of project environmental review <br />Moderate intensity Precise Plan alternative, Redwood Creek that involve modifications applicants <br />future Precise Plan-facl[tated development in to potential wetlands and other waters, <br />the vicinity of Redwood Creek may affect coordinate with representatives of the <br />potential jurisdictional wetland habitat. This California Department of Fish and Game <br />possibility represents a potentially (CDFG) and the U.S. Army Corps of <br />significant impact. Engineers (Corps}, as required by federal <br /> and state law, to ensure that any required <br /> mitigation protocols and associated <br /> individual project design modifrG~tions (e.g., <br /> spedfic setbacks from the creek, activity <br /> restrictions} are incorporated into proposed <br /> improvement plans during the initial stages <br /> of project review. Implementation of this <br /> measure would ensure that potential <br /> impacts on wetland resources are <br /> minimized and adequate replacement is <br /> provided, mitigating this potential impact to <br /> aless-than-si nifrcanf level. <br />GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br />Impact 15-1: Ground Shaking. Under Mitigation 15-1. At the City Building Individual City puring project-specific <br />either the Maximum or Moderate Intensity Official's discretion, future discretionary project environmental review <br />Precise Plan alternative, future development development projects proposed within the applicants <br />in accordance with the proposed Draft Precise Plan area shall be required to <br />Predse Plan would place new residences and undertake detailed, design-level <br />businesses in a subregion that is expected to geotechnfcal investigations that indude <br />experience severe earthquake-induced analysis of project site seismic stability, <br />ground shaking during the useful fife of the liquefaction potential, and soil response <br />project improvements. This ground characteristics with respect to ground <br />movement could cause differential settlement acceleration, in accordance with Spedal <br />of any poorly consolidated soils and induce Publication 112, "Guidelines for Analyzing <br />ground failure within alluvial soils that may be and Mitigating Liquefaction in California," <br />(D <br />~~ <br />Page 33 U.~IMylJocumentslbowntown Precise PJanICC sfaffreportslCC 3. f2.dect3.11.07 Exhi(>rtslAtfachment A mit.monrforing checklist 655.d~ D <br />